Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A85 Topic 11 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A85 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 11
[All HPE6-A85 Questions]

How does a single Aruba CX 6300M switch configuration use L3 connectivity to establish routing traffic between switch virtual interfaces 120 and 130?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

On an Aruba CX 6300M switch, routing between Switch Virtual Interfaces (SVIs) is enabled by default. Therefore, traffic between SVIs, like 120 and 130, can be routed internally without the need for additional configuration such as route leaking or static routes, as long as there is no 'no routing' configuration present on the SVIs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Vallie
1 months ago
Option A? More like 'Option Nah', am I right? Routing is never that easy.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
9 days ago
User 1: Option A? More like 'Option Nah', am I right? Routing is never that easy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
1 months ago
Hmm, Option B seems legit. Route leaking, the secret sauce of the networking world!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 months ago
Option D for the win! Simple static routes should do the trick. Gotta love the straightforward solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
1 months ago
Option C is just silly. Deleting 'no routing' won't magically enable routing.
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
13 days ago
User 3: User Comment: Option C is just silly. Deleting 'no routing' won't magically enable routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
15 days ago
User 2: B) Route leaking must be configured in default VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
23 days ago
User 1: A) Routing is enabled by default with Aruba 6300M.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desirae
1 months ago
Sure, route leaking allows routes learned from one VRF to be leaked into another VRF, enabling communication between SVI 120 and 130.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
2 months ago
Option A is a trap! Routing is not enabled by default, you gotta configure it.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
18 days ago
No, we don't need to configure route leaking. We just have to create static routes between SVI 120 and 130.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
1 months ago
So, do we need to configure route leaking in the default VRF for L3 connectivity between SVI 120 and 130?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
1 months ago
I agree, option A is definitely a trap. You have to configure routing on the Aruba 6300M.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
2 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. Can you explain why you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
2 months ago
I'd go with Option D. Creating static routes is the way to go for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Jani
1 months ago
I agree, creating static routes is the most efficient way to establish connectivity in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
2 months ago
Option D is the best choice for setting up routing between SVI 120 and 130.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desirae
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Route leaking must be configured in default VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Routing is enabled by default with Aruba 6300M.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
2 months ago
Option B sounds right. You need to configure route leaking to get traffic between those SVIs.
upvoted 0 times
Katy
1 months ago
Exactly, it's an important step in the configuration process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
2 months ago
That makes sense, it's necessary to establish routing traffic between the SVIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
2 months ago
Yes, route leaking must be configured in default VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel