HP Exam HPE6-A85 Topic 11 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A85 exam

Question #: 35
Topic #: 11

How does a single Aruba CX 6300M switch configuration use L3 connectivity to establish routing traffic between switch virtual interfaces 120 and 130?

ARouting is enabled by default with Aruba 6300M.

BRoute leaking must be configured in default VRF.

CDelete 'no routing' from the SVI interfaces.

DCreate static routes between SVI 120 and 130.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

On an Aruba CX 6300M switch, routing between Switch Virtual Interfaces (SVIs) is enabled by default. Therefore, traffic between SVIs, like 120 and 130, can be routed internally without the need for additional configuration such as route leaking or static routes, as long as there is no 'no routing' configuration present on the SVIs.

by Tori at Dec 09, 2024, 02:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A85 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Vallie

2 months ago

Option A? More like 'Option Nah', am I right? Routing is never that easy.

upvoted 0 times

Elza

24 days ago

User 4: Yeah, creating static routes between SVI 120 and 130 might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Monte

29 days ago

User 3: I think we need to configure route leaking in the default VRF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laine

1 months ago

User 2: Laine is right, routing can be tricky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

1 months ago

User 1: Option A? More like 'Option Nah', am I right? Routing is never that easy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

2 months ago

Hmm, Option B seems legit. Route leaking, the secret sauce of the networking world!

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

2 months ago

Option D for the win! Simple static routes should do the trick. Gotta love the straightforward solutions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

3 months ago

Option C is just silly. Deleting 'no routing' won't magically enable routing.

upvoted 0 times

Ernie

2 months ago

User 3: User Comment: Option C is just silly. Deleting 'no routing' won't magically enable routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zona

2 months ago

User 2: B) Route leaking must be configured in default VRF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edmond

2 months ago

User 1: A) Routing is enabled by default with Aruba 6300M.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desirae

3 months ago

Sure, route leaking allows routes learned from one VRF to be leaked into another VRF, enabling communication between SVI 120 and 130.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissia

3 months ago

Option A is a trap! Routing is not enabled by default, you gotta configure it.

upvoted 0 times

Elvera

2 months ago

No, we don't need to configure route leaking. We just have to create static routes between SVI 120 and 130.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

2 months ago

So, do we need to configure route leaking in the default VRF for L3 connectivity between SVI 120 and 130?

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

2 months ago

I agree, option A is definitely a trap. You have to configure routing on the Aruba 6300M.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

3 months ago

Hmm, that's interesting. Can you explain why you think that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Raelene

3 months ago

I'd go with Option D. Creating static routes is the way to go for this specific scenario.

upvoted 0 times

Jani

3 months ago

I agree, creating static routes is the most efficient way to establish connectivity in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franklyn

3 months ago

Option D is the best choice for setting up routing between SVI 120 and 130.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desirae

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Route leaking must be configured in default VRF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) Routing is enabled by default with Aruba 6300M.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvis

3 months ago

Option B sounds right. You need to configure route leaking to get traffic between those SVIs.

upvoted 0 times

Katy

3 months ago

Exactly, it's an important step in the configuration process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kyoko

3 months ago

That makes sense, it's necessary to establish routing traffic between the SVIs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

3 months ago

Yes, route leaking must be configured in default VRF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remedios

3 months ago

I think option B is the correct choice.

upvoted 0 times

...