Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A73 Topic 6 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A73 exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 6
[All HPE6-A73 Questions]

A network administrator is tasked to set up BGP in the company's network. The administrator is defining an eBGP peering between an AOS-CX switch and a directly-connected service provider. The administrator has configured the following on the AOS-CX switch:

However, when using the "show bgp all summary" command, the state does not display "Established" for the eBGP peer. What must the administrator configure to fix this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jenelle at Jan 27, 2025, 04:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A73 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Toi
1 months ago
Wow, the administrator is really struggling with this one. I mean, they've got the BGP process configured and the neighbor address, but the session just won't come up. Maybe they should try turning it off and on again? Option B might do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
8 days ago
True, activating the neighbor address family could also fix the issue. It's worth a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
10 days ago
But what if they need to specify the neighbor address family for IPv4 unicast? Option C could be the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
15 days ago
Yeah, that might help establish the eBGP peering with the service provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
20 days ago
I think the administrator should try enabling the BGP process with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Camellia
1 months ago
Haha, this is a classic BGP troubleshooting scenario. I bet the administrator forgot to activate the IPv4 unicast address family for the BGP neighbor. Option C looks like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
19 days ago
I think you're right, Option C seems like the most likely solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eladia
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C) router bgp 64500 address-family ipv4 unicast neighbor 192.168.1.1 activate could also be a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
2 months ago
I agree with Demetra, setting up ebgp-multihop should fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
2 months ago
Hmm, the administrator has already configured the BGP process and the neighbor address, but the session isn't coming up. I'd say the issue is probably with the TCP session establishment. Maybe the administrator needs to configure eBGP multihop to allow the session to be established across the directly-connected interfaces. Option A could be the fix.
upvoted 0 times
Lucy
1 months ago
Yes, configuring eBGP multihop could solve the issue with the TCP session establishment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 months ago
I think you're right, the eBGP multihop configuration might be necessary for the session to come up.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Demetra
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) router bgp 64500 neighbor 192.168.1.1 ebgp-multihop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
2 months ago
Wait, the state isn't 'Established'? That's a bummer. I think the administrator needs to configure the BGP neighbor to use the loopback interface to establish the session. Option D looks like the right solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
1 months ago
The 'update-source loopback0' command is necessary for establishing the BGP session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
1 months ago
Yes, configuring the BGP neighbor to use the loopback interface should fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
1 months ago
Option D looks like the right solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel