Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 8 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 8
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A customer has implemented this ArubaOS-CX solution. NetEdit is not present. After a while, the secondary node of the VSX-cluster fails. What is the correct procedure to replace the failed node as quickly as possible?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Pete at Jan 12, 2025, 12:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jutta
1 months ago
Option C all the way! Gotta love that recovery mode - it's like a cheat code for network admins.
upvoted 0 times
Ceola
3 days ago
User 2: I agree, it's like a shortcut for getting things back up and running quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
13 days ago
User 1: Option C is definitely the way to go. Recovery mode makes everything so much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hillary
1 months ago
Hmm, Option A sounds a bit too complicated. I don't want to be waiting around for VSX to synchronize if I can avoid it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
2 months ago
Option D is tempting, but I'd rather not rely on VSX to do all the heavy lifting. Better to be in control of the process.
upvoted 0 times
Lillian
24 days ago
B: Yeah, I think option C is the safer choice. It's better to be in control of the recovery process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
28 days ago
A: I agree, option D seems risky. I would go with option C for more control over the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
1 months ago
C) Replace the failed unit, connect the correct cables, boot up the new node in recovery mode, upgrade firmware and restore, and save config Then, reboot and wait for VSX to synchronize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
1 months ago
A) Replace the failed unit, boot up the new node without connecting cables, upgrade firmware, and restore and save config Shutdown all ports, reconnect the correct cables, and enable all ports
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marisha
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D also sounds reasonable to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
2 months ago
I'd go with Option B. Shutting down all the ports before reconnecting the cables seems like a safer way to avoid any issues.
upvoted 0 times
Leah
1 months ago
User3: Option B does seem like the safest procedure to quickly replace the failed node in the ArubaOS-CX solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 months ago
User2: Agreed, it's always better to be safe when replacing a failed node in a VSX-cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
1 months ago
User1: I think Option B is the best choice. Shutting down all ports before reconnecting cables sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buddy
2 months ago
I agree with Paulina, option C seems to be the most efficient way to replace the failed node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
2 months ago
I think the correct procedure is option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
2 months ago
Option C looks like the most straightforward way to get the secondary node back up and running quickly. Upgrading the firmware and restoring the config in recovery mode seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
Herman
1 months ago
Always good to have a clear procedure in place for situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 months ago
Upgrading firmware and restoring config in recovery mode can help avoid any potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
2 months ago
It's important to follow the correct steps to ensure a smooth recovery process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most efficient way to replace the failed node in a VSX-cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel