Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 6 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 6
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A customer has implemented this ArubaOS-CX solution. NetEdit is not present. After a while, the secondary node of the VSX-cluster fails. What is the correct procedure to replace the failed node as quickly as possible?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elvera at Jul 07, 2024, 03:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Leah
1 months ago
Hey, where's the option to just unplug the failed node, tape a note to it saying 'broken, please fix', and walk away? Asking for a friend.
upvoted 0 times
Dorinda
4 days ago
A) Replace the failed unit, boot up the new node without connecting cables, upgrade firmware and configure as secondary vsx node connect iSl and wart for VSX to synchronize After successful recovery, reconnect the remaining cables.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvie
1 months ago
I think option B is the best choice because it includes shutting down all ports before reconnecting cables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 months ago
Hmm, option A sounds like it involves a lot of unnecessary steps. Why bother waiting for the VSX to sync after upgrading the firmware? Just do it all in one go.
upvoted 0 times
Dong
16 days ago
But what if there are compatibility issues with the firmware upgrade? Maybe that's why they suggest waiting for the VSX to sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
17 days ago
I agree, option A does seem to have extra steps. It might be quicker to do it all at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but option D also sounds reasonable to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
1 months ago
I agree with Katina, option C seems to be the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 months ago
Option D is way too simple. There's no way it's that easy to replace a failed VSX node. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 months ago
I would go with option B. Shutting down the ports before reconnecting the cables seems like a safer approach to avoid any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
2 months ago
I think the correct procedure is option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
2 months ago
Option C seems the most logical. Restoring the config and then letting VSX synchronize is the quickest way to get the node back online.
upvoted 0 times
Dell
28 days ago
Tonette: Let's go with option C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
1 months ago
User 3: Yeah, that way we can get the node back online as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 months ago
User 2: Agreed, restoring the config and letting VSX synchronize seems like the quickest way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
1 months ago
User 1: I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel