Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 5 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 5
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Company A and Company B are merging their BGP routed networks The companies have overlapping IP ranges and security concerns during the migration phase. Which Aruba CX 8325 functionality would help the merging of networks in a secure way?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Delisa at Dec 11, 2024, 02:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Felice
2 months ago
D) all the way! Virtual routing and BGP leaking is like a magician's trick for merging networks. Abracadabra, problem solved!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 months ago
I'm going with D. Separating the networks with VRF and then selectively leaking routes sounds like a surgical solution to this problem. Elegant and secure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
2 months ago
Hmm, D looks good, but I'd also consider B) Aruba Gateway appliance. Might be a bit overkill, but it could provide an extra layer of control and security.
upvoted 0 times
Leah
2 months ago
You're right, B) could be a good choice for added security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
2 months ago
True, but B) Aruba Gateway appliance could provide an extra layer of control and security during the migration phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
2 months ago
Agreed, using both options could ensure a secure merging of the networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
2 months ago
I agree, D) sounds like a good option for securely integrating the networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
2 months ago
True, but B) Aruba Gateway appliance could provide an extra layer of security during the migration phase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
2 months ago
I think D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking could help with the merging of networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
2 months ago
I think D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking could help with the overlapping IP ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delmy
3 months ago
Definitely D. VRF and route leaking is the way to go here. Keeps the networks separate while allowing the required connectivity. Simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
3 months ago
D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking seems like the most secure option to handle the overlapping IP ranges during the migration phase. I like the flexibility it provides.
upvoted 0 times
Cathrine
2 months ago
C) Use of vsf capable switch to integrate the routing
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
2 months ago
D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
2 months ago
A) Use of ACL's to separate the company networks at the VLAN level
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shad
3 months ago
I see both points, but I think option C) could also be a good solution by using vsf capable switch to integrate the routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D) is more suitable as virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking can ensure smooth integration of the networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
3 months ago
I think option A) is the best choice because ACL's can help separate the networks securely.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel