HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 5 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 5

Refer to the exhibit.

A customer has implemented this ArubaOS-CX solution. NetEdit is not present. After a while, the secondary node of the VSX-cluster fails. What is the correct procedure to replace the failed node as quickly as possible?

AReplace the failed unit, boot up the new node without connecting cables, upgrade firmware and configure as secondary vsx node connect iSl and wart for VSX to synchronize After successful recovery, reconnect the remaining cables.

BReplace the failed unit, boot up the new node without connecting cables, upgrade firmware, and restore and save config Shutdown all ports, reconnect the correct cables, and enable all ports

CReplace the failed unit, connect the correct cables, boot up the new node in recovery mode, upgrade firmware and restore, and save config Then, reboot and wait for VSX to synchronize.

DReplace the failed unit, connect the correct cables, boot up the new node and wait for VSX to synchronize configuration and firmware.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Hyun at Oct 22, 2024, 03:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Hyun

2 months ago

Option D seems the easiest, but I'm worried about the time it takes for VSX to synchronize. Maybe a combination of C and D would be the best approach?

upvoted 0 times

Scarlet

21 days ago

That sounds like a good plan. It's important to balance speed and reliability in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirk

27 days ago

I agree, maybe a combination of C and D would be the best approach to ensure a quicker recovery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

1 months ago

Option D is indeed the easiest, but we need to consider the time for VSX to synchronize.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

2 months ago

Haha, I bet the customer's IT team is cursing the day they decided to go with Aruba. Replacing a failed node should be a simple process, not a trivia question!

upvoted 0 times

Keneth

29 days ago

Lashawn: Yeah, connecting the cables first and then upgrading firmware makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ethan

1 months ago

User 3: Option C seems like the most straightforward procedure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

1 months ago

User 2: I agree, it seems like a lot of steps just to replace a node.

upvoted 0 times

...

King

1 months ago

User 1: I know, right? It shouldn't be this complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

2 months ago

I'm not sure about booting in recovery mode. Isn't there a risk of data loss? Option B looks safer, even if it takes a bit longer.

upvoted 0 times

Jeannetta

1 months ago

C: I think it's better to be cautious and follow Option B to avoid any potential data loss.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felton

1 months ago

A: That's true, but Option B specifically mentions shutting down all ports before reconnecting cables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharmaine

1 months ago

B: But Option C also ensures data safety by restoring and saving the config before rebooting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

2 months ago

A: Option B looks safer because it involves saving the config before reconnecting cables.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

2 months ago

Option C seems the most straightforward. Booting in recovery mode to upgrade the firmware and restore the config sounds like the quickest way to get the node back up and running.

upvoted 0 times