HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 4

The customer is already using Aruba Gateway and third-party L2 switches New ArubaOS CX 6300 switches have been deployed for R&D. which have a requirement for user profiling and tunneled traffic between ArubaOS CX 6300 and Aruba Gateway

What is required for this configuration to apply QoS user-based rules for the R&D client traffic?

AApply a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port, lo classify traffic before it is tunneled.

BApply a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch

CManually prioritize IP protocol 47 traffic on the third-party switches to prioritize the tunneled traffic

DCreate a QoS policy for the UBT-client-VLAN traffic on the third-party switch.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Arlene at Jul 01, 2024, 03:31 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cruz

3 months ago

Wait, are we sure this isn't a trick question? I mean, what if the answer is actually E) Summon the ghost of Aruba's founder and have them personally configure the switches? Just a thought.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reuben

3 months ago

Whoa, hold up there, Nancey. I think option D is the real winner here. Creating a QoS policy for the UBT-client-VLAN traffic on the third-party switch is the way to go. That's where the magic happens, my friend.

upvoted 0 times

Jacki

2 months ago

Absolutely, focusing on the UBT-client-VLAN traffic will help optimize the R&D client experience.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

3 months ago

That makes sense. It's all about ensuring the right traffic gets the priority it needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

3 months ago

I agree, setting up a QoS policy on the third-party switch for that specific traffic is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephen

3 months ago

Option D is definitely the way to go. Prioritizing the UBT-client-VLAN traffic is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nancey

4 months ago

You guys are both missing the obvious solution. It's clearly option C - manually prioritizing the IP protocol 47 traffic on the third-party switches. That's the way to go, trust me.

upvoted 0 times

Ashton

2 months ago

Actually, I agree with the user comment. Option C makes the most sense. Manually prioritizing IP protocol 47 traffic on the third-party switches is the solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option B is the way to go. We need to apply a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marge

3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. We should apply a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port.

upvoted 0 times

...

Van

3 months ago

You guys are both missing the obvious solution. It's clearly option C - manually prioritizing the IP protocol 47 traffic on the third-party switches. That's the way to go, trust me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option B is the way to go. We should apply a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. We should apply a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erasmo

4 months ago

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one, Tammara. I think option A is the better choice here. Classifying the traffic before it's tunneled just makes more sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

Leonida

4 months ago

I see your point, but I still think applying a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearlie

4 months ago

I think option A is the better choice here. Classifying the traffic before it's tunneled just makes more sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

4 months ago

I'm not sure about option B, but it could also work if we define QoS in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carrol

4 months ago

I agree with Kanisha, applying a QoS rule to the ArubaCX 6300 client port makes sense for user-based rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammara

4 months ago

Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Applying a port-access policy with QoS on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch seems like the most straightforward solution to me.

upvoted 0 times

Meghann

3 months ago

Definitely, applying a port-access policy with QoS defined in the user role on the ArubaOS CX6300 switch is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

4 months ago

I think we should go with option B as well, it will make it easier to manage and prioritize the traffic effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kassandra

4 months ago

Yeah, it seems like the most straightforward solution to ensure proper user profiling and tunneled traffic between the switches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacqueline

4 months ago

I agree, option B sounds like the best choice for applying QoS user-based rules for the R&D client traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

5 months ago

I think option A is the correct choice because we need to classify traffic before it is tunneled.

upvoted 0 times

...