Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

You want to protect the aggregation layer if the VSXISL falls. Where should you place a VSX keepalive link?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Vashti at Jun 20, 2024, 08:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Phuong
3 months ago
I'm going with B. Gotta keep that aggregation layer safe, no matter what happens to the VSXISL.
upvoted 0 times
Charlette
25 days ago
User1: Definitely, we need to ensure the VSXISL falling doesn't compromise the aggregation layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
26 days ago
User2: Agreed, having a dedicated link on port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
27 days ago
User1: I think B is the best option for keeping the aggregation layer protected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 months ago
I'm going with B. Gotta keep that aggregation layer safe, no matter what happens to the VSXISL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
2 months ago
B) On a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
A) On VSX LAG 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherell
3 months ago
I think D is the correct answer, placing the VSX keepalive link on VSX LAG 101 makes more sense for protecting the aggregation layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
3 months ago
Haha, putting it on the OOBM ports? That's like using a toothpick to fix a broken bridge!
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
2 months ago
Maira: Definitely, we need a solid solution to protect the aggregation layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
User 3: Haha, yeah, using the OOBM ports for that would be risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
2 months ago
User 2: Agreed, that seems like a more reliable option than using the OOBM ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
2 months ago
User 1: I think the keepalive link should be on a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tori
3 months ago
But wouldn't placing it on the OOBM ports of both aggregation switches be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it should be on a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
3 months ago
I agree, B makes the most sense. You don't want to rely on existing LAGs for this critical keepalive link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
3 months ago
The correct answer is B. A dedicated link between the aggregation switches is the way to go to protect the aggregation layer if the VSXISL fails.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
2 months ago
User 2: No, the correct answer is B) On a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
3 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is A) On VSX LAG 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tori
4 months ago
I think the VSX keepalive link should be placed on VSX LAG 1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel