HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam

Question #: 38
Topic #: 3

[All HPE6-A69 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

You want to protect the aggregation layer if the VSXISL falls. Where should you place a VSX keepalive link?

AOn VSX LAG 1

BOn a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch

COn the OOBM ports of both aggregation switches

DOn VSX LAG 101

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Vashti at Jun 20, 2024, 08:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Phuong

4 months ago

I'm going with B. Gotta keep that aggregation layer safe, no matter what happens to the VSXISL.

upvoted 0 times

Charlette

2 months ago

Definitely, we need to ensure the VSXISL falling doesn't compromise the aggregation layer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Burma

2 months ago

Agreed, having a dedicated link on port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch seems like a solid choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

2 months ago

I think B is the best option for keeping the aggregation layer protected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlene

2 months ago

I'm going with B. Gotta keep that aggregation layer safe, no matter what happens to the VSXISL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elise

3 months ago

B) On a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch

upvoted 0 times

...

Casie

3 months ago

A) On VSX LAG 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

4 months ago

I think D is the correct answer, placing the VSX keepalive link on VSX LAG 101 makes more sense for protecting the aggregation layer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mirta

4 months ago

Haha, putting it on the OOBM ports? That's like using a toothpick to fix a broken bridge!

upvoted 0 times

Dulce

3 months ago

Maira: Definitely, we need a solid solution to protect the aggregation layer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

4 months ago

Haha, yeah, using the OOBM ports for that would be risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maira

4 months ago

Agreed, that seems like a more reliable option than using the OOBM ports.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliana

4 months ago

I think the keepalive link should be on a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tori

4 months ago

But wouldn't placing it on the OOBM ports of both aggregation switches be a better option?

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

4 months ago

I disagree, I believe it should be on a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lasandra

4 months ago

I agree, B makes the most sense. You don't want to rely on existing LAGs for this critical keepalive link.

upvoted 0 times

...

Colby

4 months ago

The correct answer is B. A dedicated link between the aggregation switches is the way to go to protect the aggregation layer if the VSXISL fails.

upvoted 0 times

Maurine

4 months ago

No, the correct answer is B) On a dedicated link created using port 1'1/48 of each aggregation switch

upvoted 0 times

...

Luz

4 months ago

I think the answer is A) On VSX LAG 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Tori

5 months ago

I think the VSX keepalive link should be placed on VSX LAG 1.

upvoted 0 times

...