New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE0-S60 Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-S60 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All HPE0-S60 Questions]

As a result of the troubleshooting process, you recommend replacing, HPE Synergy Composer modules which HPE Synergy Composer 2

Why would you recommend this change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Deane at Jul 09, 2024, 02:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE0-S60 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Golda
5 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Who needs all those extra interfaces when you can just support more frames, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Kate
4 months ago
Blossom: Exactly, it's all about efficiency and maximizing resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
4 months ago
Agreed, having the ability to support more frames is crucial for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
4 months ago
Option B is definitely the better choice. More frames means more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
5 months ago
And HPE Composer 1 cannot support remote frames, making management more difficult.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question was really trying to trip us up with all those acronyms! But option B looks like the winner to me.
upvoted 0 times
Mozell
4 months ago
Definitely, it's important to consider the capabilities of the different options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
4 months ago
Yeah, I think so too. It makes sense to go with the one that can support more frames.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
4 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
4 months ago
Definitely, it's important to consider the capabilities of the different modules before making a recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
4 months ago
Yeah, I think so too. HPE Composer 2 can support more frames than HPE Composer 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
5 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Launa
5 months ago
Exactly, HPE Composer 2 provides access to more interfaces for remote management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
5 months ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but option B seems like the best choice to me. Increasing the frame support is a good reason to upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
Lashawna
5 months ago
Definitely, it would make management much easier with more frames supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
5 months ago
I agree, increasing frame support is crucial for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
5 months ago
I agree, HPE Composer 2 can support more frames than HPE Composer 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
6 months ago
B definitely seems like the correct answer. Upgrading to HPE Composer 2 to support more frames makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Mignon
4 months ago
Rodney: It's important to have access to all the interfaces for remote management as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
4 months ago
Definitely, it will make the configuration and management procedures much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
5 months ago
Agreed, having the ability to support more frames is crucial for efficient management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
5 months ago
I think B is the best option. Upgrading to HPE Composer 2 will allow for more frames to be supported.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Launa
6 months ago
I think we should replace the HPE Synergy Composer modules with HPE Synergy Composer 2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel