Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE0-S60 Topic 3 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-S60 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 3
[All HPE0-S60 Questions]

As a result of the troubleshooting process, you recommend replacing, HPE Synergy Composer modules which HPE Synergy Composer 2

Why would you recommend this change?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Arleen at May 18, 2024, 03:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE0-S60 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Kristel
9 months ago
Wait, they're not asking about the number of composers we can fit in a band, are they? That's the real troubleshooting I need to know about!
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
8 months ago
C) HPE Composer 2 provides access to 105 interface that can be used for full management of HPE Composer 2 remotely
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
8 months ago
B) HPE Composer 2 can support more than the maximum 21 frames that are supported with HPE Composer 1 and HPE OneView.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
8 months ago
A) HPE Composer 1 running HPE OneView 5 2 or later can support only 12 frames within a single management nog
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Peggie
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. More frames or better remote management? Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
Alfreda
8 months ago
Why not both? C for better remote management and B for more frames!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
8 months ago
I see your point, but I'm leaning towards C. Remote management is key for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
8 months ago
I think B is the way to go. More frames means more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rutha
9 months ago
I'm going with C. The 105 interface for remote management of HPE Composer 2 seems like a game-changer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
9 months ago
D sounds like a good option too. If the remote frames can't be supported, that would definitely double the effort required.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
8 months ago
Hyman: Good point. D would definitely make the management process more difficult.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
9 months ago
Yeah, that's true. But D also makes sense. If remote frames can't be supported, it would be a lot more work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
9 months ago
I think B is the best option. HPE Composer 2 can support more frames than HPE Composer 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roy
9 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. The increased frame support of HPE Composer 2 seems like the most relevant change to address the troubleshooting issue.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
9 months ago
Yes, it would make managing the frames much easier and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
9 months ago
I agree, the increased frame support with HPE Composer 2 would definitely help with the troubleshooting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
9 months ago
Definitely, it will make a big difference in managing the system efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
9 months ago
I agree, the increased frame support of HPE Composer 2 is crucial for troubleshooting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
9 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
9 months ago
I agree, the increased frame support of HPE Composer 2 is crucial for troubleshooting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel