New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE0-S57 Topic 11 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-S57 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 11
[All HPE0-S57 Questions]

A customer has the following HPE SlmphVity configuration.

* 4 nodes in 1 cluster - 2 x 16c CPU

* 384 GB RAM

* Medium 4000 storage kit

* SFP+ connectivity

* VMware hypervisor

The customer needs to increase the available storage capacity in the configuration. What is the most cost-effective solution that meets your customers needs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Graciela at Jul 02, 2024, 12:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE0-S57 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lindsey
5 months ago
Dude, did you see the power consumption on those SimpliVity nodes? Might as well power a small town with that. Option C is the way to go, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
5 months ago
Option B? More hardware? Nah, man, that's overkill. C is where it's at. Simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
Nicolette
4 months ago
Yeah, adding more disks per node seems like a more cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
4 months ago
C is where it's at. Simple and effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
4 months ago
B) Add four 'HPE SimpliVity 380 2 Processor Medium to Large Storage Upgrade E-LTU' storage expansion kits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
C) Add additional disks per node for the required capacity, and do a RAID expansion by using Smart Storage Administrator (SSA).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mary
5 months ago
If I were the customer, I'd go with Option C. Gotta love that Smart Storage Administrator tool, makes life so much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
5 months ago
Have you considered the energy costs of running all those nodes? Option C might be the greenest choice too.
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
3 months ago
Have you considered the energy costs though? Option C might be a greener choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
3 months ago
I agree, adding storage expansion kits seems like a cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
4 months ago
I think option B would be the best choice to increase storage capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
4 months ago
Offloading backups to a StoreOnce backup target could also help free up space for production data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Adding additional disks per node and doing a RAID expansion seems like a smart choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
5 months ago
I think Option C is a good idea. It's more environmentally friendly and cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Heike
5 months ago
I agree, Option C is the way to go. It allows you to easily increase the storage capacity without adding an entire new node.
upvoted 0 times
Amalia
5 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivory
5 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alverta
5 months ago
I agree with Claribel, offloading backups to free up space seems like a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
6 months ago
But adding more disks per node could be risky, what if there's a failure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
6 months ago
Option C seems the most cost-effective. Expanding the RAID with additional disks is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Amalia
5 months ago
Yes, adding additional disks per node for the required capacity is a smart move. It will definitely meet the customer's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
5 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice. It's a cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sonia
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
6 months ago
I think option B is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel