Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE0-S57 Topic 10 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-S57 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 10
[All HPE0-S57 Questions]

A customer has the following HPE SlmphVity configuration.

* 4 nodes in 1 cluster - 2 x 16c CPU

* 384 GB RAM

* Medium 4000 storage kit

* SFP+ connectivity

* VMware hypervisor

The customer needs to increase the available storage capacity in the configuration. What is the most cost-effective solution that meets your customers needs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gerald at May 23, 2024, 03:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE0-S57 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Craig
2 months ago
You know, I've heard that RAID stands for 'Rapidly Accelerating Irritating Decisions'. But in this case, option C is the way to go. Gotta love those cost-effective solutions!
upvoted 0 times
Carisa
1 months ago
Adding additional disks per node and doing a RAID expansion sounds like a practical solution to meet the customer's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
1 months ago
RAID expansion using Smart Storage Administrator is definitely a good way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
2 months ago
It's great to see customers making informed decisions for cost-effective solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most cost-effective solution for increasing storage capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
2 months ago
I agree, adding additional disks per node and using SSA for RAID expansion is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
2 months ago
RAID expansion is definitely the way to go for cost-effective storage capacity increase.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ayesha
3 months ago
Ah, the age-old question: How do I get more storage without breaking the bank? I agree, C is the way to go. Though I'd steer clear of the 'Smart Storage Administrator' - sounds like it might be smarter than me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
3 months ago
Option C all the way! Expanding the storage within the existing nodes is definitely the most budget-friendly choice. Plus, who doesn't love a good RAID party?
upvoted 0 times
Cornell
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
2 months ago
Agreed! RAID party all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
2 months ago
That's a solid choice! Expanding within the existing nodes is cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 months ago
C) Add additional disks per node for the required capacity, and do a RAID expansion by using Smart Storage Administrator (SSA).
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
3 months ago
I'm not too sure about the other options. Offloading backups or buying a new node could get a bit pricey. I think C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
3 months ago
Hmm, the most cost-effective solution seems to be option C. Adding disks and doing a RAID expansion is a great way to increase storage capacity without having to buy a whole new node.
upvoted 0 times
Zita
2 months ago
Agreed, it's important to find the solution that best fits the customer's specific requirements and constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
2 months ago
In that case, I think discussing all the options with the customer and weighing the pros and cons would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
2 months ago
That's true, but it could also be the most expensive option. It really depends on the customer's budget and needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
2 months ago
I see your point, but adding a whole new node like in option D might provide the most long-term scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
3 months ago
True, but offloading backups to a separate target like in option A could also free up a lot of space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
3 months ago
But wouldn't adding more storage expansion kits be easier and faster? That's what option B is offering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
3 months ago
Option C sounds like a good idea. It's cost-effective and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel