Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE0-J68 Topic 6 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-J68 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 6
[All HPE0-J68 Questions]

A customer has a large amount of the data on their Primera that is mission critical. The business needs RPO to be under 5 minutes.

Which protection technology should you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Chantell at Jul 02, 2024, 02:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE0-J68 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Goldie
2 months ago
Synchronous replication is the only option that can truly ensure your data is safe and sound, with an RPO that tight. Anything less and you might as well just throw the data out the window!
upvoted 0 times
Tamie
1 months ago
Synchronous replication is the best choice for mission critical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
2 months ago
User 3: Definitely, you need that real-time data protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
2 months ago
User 2: Agreed, with an RPO under 5 minutes, synchronous replication is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
2 months ago
User 1: I would recommend synchronous replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jackie
2 months ago
Backup to tape? Are we still living in the 90s? Synchronous replication is the way to go, unless you want to be spending all your time babysitting those tapes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
2 months ago
I think archiving might not meet the RPO requirement of under 5 minutes, so I would go with synchronous replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
3 months ago
Archiving? What is this, the stone age? We need something a little more modern to handle that mission-critical data. Synchronous replication all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Krissy
1 months ago
Asynchronous replication could also be a good option for ensuring RPO is under 5 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, synchronous replication is the way to go for mission-critical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
User 1: Archiving is outdated. We need something more modern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
2 months ago
User 3: Definitely, we need RPO under 5 minutes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, synchronous replication is the way to go for mission-critical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
2 months ago
User 1: Archiving is outdated. We need something more modern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, synchronous replication is the way to go for mission-critical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
2 months ago
User 1: Archiving is outdated. We need something more modern.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacob
3 months ago
Asynchronous replication? Nah, that's not gonna cut it with that kind of data and RPO requirement. You need something rock-solid, like synchronous replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think asynchronous replication could also be a good option for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
3 months ago
I agree with Rhea, synchronous replication ensures data consistency and minimal data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
3 months ago
Synchronous replication is the way to go for that tight RPO! Anything less than 5 minutes is gonna be a real challenge, but this tech can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
Silvana
1 months ago
User 4: Definitely, it ensures that data is constantly mirrored in real-time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
2 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's the most reliable option for mission critical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, anything less than 5 minutes is a real challenge, but synchronous replication can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
2 months ago
User 1: Synchronous replication is definitely the best option for that tight RPO requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rhea
3 months ago
I think we should recommend synchronous replication for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel