Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Questions

The best way to operationalize your training process is to use Vertex AI Pipelines, which allows you to create and run scalable, portable, and reproducible workflows for your ML models. Vertex AI Pipelines also integrates with Vertex AI Metadata, which tracks the provenance, lineage, and artifacts of your ML models. By using a Vertex AI CustomTrainingJobOp component, you can train your model using the same code as in your Jupyter notebook. By using a ModelUploadOp component, you can upload your trained model to Vertex AI Model Registry, which manages the versions and endpoints of your models. By using Cloud Scheduler and Cloud Functions, you can trigger your Vertex AI pipeline to run weekly, according to your plan.Reference:

Vertex AI Pipelines documentation

Vertex AI Metadata documentation

Vertex AI CustomTrainingJobOp documentation

ModelUploadOp documentation

Cloud Scheduler documentation

[Cloud Functions documentation]

Traffic splitting is a feature of Vertex AI that allows you to distribute the prediction requests among multiple models or model versions within the same endpoint. You can specify the percentage of traffic that each model or model version receives, and change it at any time. Traffic splitting can help you test the new model in production without creating a new endpoint or a separate service. You can deploy the new model to the existing Vertex AI endpoint, and use traffic splitting to send 5% of production traffic to the new model. You can monitor the end-user metrics, such as listening time, to compare the performance of the new model and the previous model. If the end-user metrics improve between models over time, you can gradually increase the percentage of production traffic sent to the new model. This solution can help you test the new model in production while minimizing complexity and cost.Reference:

Traffic splitting | Vertex AI

Deploying models to endpoints | Vertex AI

The best option to build a game recommendation model with the least amount of coding is to use BigQuery ML, which allows you to create and execute machine learning models using standard SQL queries. BigQuery ML supports several types of models, including matrix factorization, which is a common technique for collaborative filtering-based recommendation systems. Matrix factorization models learn latent factors for users and items from the observed ratings, and then use them to predict the ratings for new user-item pairs. BigQuery ML provides a built-in function calledML.RECOMMENDthat can generate recommendations for a given user based on a trained matrix factorization model. To use BigQuery ML, you need to load the data in BigQuery, which is a serverless, scalable, and cost-effective data warehouse. You can use thebqcommand-line tool, the BigQuery API, or the Cloud Console to load data from Cloud Storage to BigQuery. Alternatively, you can use federated queries to query data directly from Cloud Storage without loading it to BigQuery, but this may incur additional costs and performance overhead. Option A is incorrect because BigQuery ML does not support Autoencoder models, which are a type of neural network that can learn compressed representations of the input data. Autoencoder models are not suitable for recommendation systems, as they do not capture the interactions between users and items. Option C is incorrect because using TensorFlow to train a two-tower model requires more coding than using BigQuery ML. A two-tower model is a type of neural network that learns embeddings for users and items separately, and then combines them with a dot product or a cosine similarity to compute the rating. TensorFlow is a low-level framework that requires you to define the model architecture, the loss function, the optimizer, the training loop, and the evaluation metrics. Moreover, you need to read the data from Cloud Storage to a Vertex AI Workbench notebook, which is an instance of JupyterLab that runs on a Google Cloud virtual machine. This may involve additional steps such as authentication, authorization, and data preprocessing. Option D is incorrect because using TensorFlow to train a matrix factorization model also requires more coding than using BigQuery ML. Although TensorFlow provides some high-level APIs such as Keras and TensorFlow Recommenders that can simplify the model development, you still need to handle the data loading and the model training and evaluation yourself. Furthermore, you need to read the data from Cloud Storage to a Vertex AI Workbench notebook, which may incur additional complexity and costs.Reference:

BigQuery ML documentation

Using matrix factorization with BigQuery ML

Recommendations AI documentation

Loading data into BigQuery

Querying data in Cloud Storage from BigQuery

Vertex AI Workbench documentation

TensorFlow documentation

TensorFlow Recommenders documentation

The best option to stabilize the pipeline without downgrading the evaluation quality while minimizing infrastructure overhead is to use Dataflow as the runner for the evaluation step. Dataflow is a fully managed service for executing Apache Beam pipelines that can scale up and down according to the workload. Dataflow can handle large-scale, distributed data processing tasks such as model evaluation, and it can also integrate with Vertex AI Pipelines and TensorFlow Extended (TFX). By using the flag-runner=DataflowRunnerinbeam_pipeline_args, you can instruct the Evaluator component to run the evaluation step on Dataflow, instead of using the default DirectRunner, which runs locally and may cause out-of-memory errors. Option A is incorrect because addingtfma.MetricsSpec()to limit the number of metrics in the evaluation step may downgrade the evaluation quality, as some important metrics may be omitted. Moreover, reducing the number of metrics may not solve the out-of-memory error, as the evaluation step may still consume a lot of memory depending on the size and complexity of the data and the model. Option B is incorrect because migrating the pipeline to Kubeflow hosted on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) may increase the infrastructure overhead, as you need to provision, manage, and monitor the GKE cluster yourself. Moreover, you need to specify the appropriate node parameters for the evaluation step, which may require trial and error to find the optimal configuration. Option D is incorrect because moving the evaluation step out of the pipeline and running it on custom Compute Engine VMs may also increase the infrastructure overhead, as you need to create, configure, and delete the VMs yourself. Moreover, you need to ensure that the VMs have sufficient memory for the evaluation step, which may require trial and error to find the optimal machine type.Reference:

Dataflow documentation

Using DataflowRunner

Evaluator component documentation

Configuring the Evaluator component