Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Machine Learning Engineer Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Machine Learning Engineer exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Machine Learning Engineer Questions]

You work at an organization that maintains a cloud-based communication platform that integrates conventional chat, voice, and video conferencing into one platform. The audio recordings are stored in Cloud Storage. All recordings have an 8 kHz sample rate and are more than one minute long. You need to implement a new feature in the platform that will automatically transcribe voice call recordings into a text for future applications, such as call summarization and sentiment analysis. How should you implement the voice call transcription feature following Google-recommended best practices?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Willodean
24 days ago
I'm not sure. Maybe upsampling to 16 kHz could improve the transcription quality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
25 days ago
I agree with Juliana. Synchronous recognition will provide real-time transcription for better accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
29 days ago
Wait, is this a trick question? If the recordings are more than a minute long, I bet the answer is D. Gotta love those long-winded callers, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Cora
13 days ago
Yeah, D makes sense for longer recordings. Those callers can really go on and on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
16 days ago
I think you're right, D seems like the best option for longer recordings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juliana
29 days ago
I think we should use the original audio sampling rate and transcribe synchronously with the Speech-to-Text API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
1 months ago
Hold up, did they say the recordings are more than a minute long? Synchronous recognition might not be the best choice then. I'd go with option D to avoid any performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
7 days ago
I think upsampling the audio to 16 kHz and using asynchronous recognition is the most practical approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
15 days ago
Yeah, synchronous recognition might not be efficient for longer recordings. Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
25 days ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice to handle longer recordings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elza
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't option B be a simpler and more straightforward approach? Sticking with the original sample rate and using asynchronous recognition could work just as well.
upvoted 0 times
Lennie
5 days ago
Mariann: That's true, it could work just as well. Let's consider both options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
9 days ago
User 3: Using the original sample rate with asynchronous recognition might still be effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
13 days ago
User 2: But wouldn't upsampling the audio to 16 kHz improve the transcription accuracy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
1 months ago
User 1: I think option B would be simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
2 months ago
I think option D is the way to go. Upsampling the audio to 16 kHz and using asynchronous recognition seems like the most robust and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
27 days ago
I believe option C could provide better quality results with the upsampled audio recordings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
30 days ago
I think option A might be faster since it uses the original audio sampling rate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
1 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the best choice for accurate transcription.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel