BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Network Engineer Topic 8 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 8
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You are designing an IP address scheme for new private Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) clusters. Due to IP address exhaustion of the RFC 1918 address space In your enterprise, you plan to use privately used public IP space for the new clusters. You want to follow Google-recommended practices. What should you do after designing your IP scheme?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

This answer follows the Google-recommended practices for using privately used public IP (PUPI) addresses for GKE Pod address blocks1. The benefits of this approach are:

It allows you to use any public IP addresses that are not owned by Google or your organization for your Pods, which can help mitigate address exhaustion in your enterprise.

It prevents any external traffic from reaching your Pods, as Google Cloud does not route PUPI addresses to the internet or to other VPC networks by default.

It enables you to use VPC Network Peering to connect your GKE cluster to other VPC networks that use different PUPI addresses, as long as you enable the export and import of custom routes for the peering connection.

It preserves the fully integrated network model of GKE, where Pods can communicate with nodes and other resources in the same VPC network without NAT.

The options that you need to select when creating a private GKE cluster with PUPI addresses are:

--disable-default-snat: This option disables source NAT for outbound traffic from Pods to destinations outside the cluster's VPC network.This is necessary to prevent Pods from using RFC 1918 addresses as their source IP addresses, which could cause conflicts with other networks that use the same address space2.

--enable-ip-alias: This option enables alias IP ranges for Pods and Services, which allows you to use separate subnet ranges for them.This is required to use PUPI addresses for Pods1.

--enable-private-nodes: This option creates a private cluster, where nodes do not have external IP addresses and can only communicate with the control plane through a private endpoint.This enhances the security and privacy of your cluster3.

Option A is incorrect because it does not use PUPI addresses for Pods, but rather RFC 1918 addresses. This does not solve the problem of address exhaustion in your enterprise. Option B is incorrect because it reuses the secondary address range for Services across multiple private GKE clusters, which could cause IP conflicts and routing issues. Option C is incorrect because it does not specify the options that are needed to create a private GKE cluster with PUPI addresses.

1:Configuring privately used public IPs for GKE | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud2:Using Cloud NAT with GKE | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud3:Private clusters | Kubernetes Engine | Google Cloud


Contribute your Thoughts:

Paulina
7 months ago
Exactly! Can you imagine the chaos if we had overlapping IP ranges across clusters? It would be a total nightmare to troubleshoot. Nope, option D is the way to go, no question about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
7 months ago
Haha, yeah, no way I'm going with that. I need my IP addresses to be unique and not overlap between clusters. Gotta keep things nice and tidy, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
7 months ago
Ha, good thing we're not doing option A or B. Reusing the secondary address range across multiple clusters? That sounds like a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Alba
6 months ago
Following best practices will definitely make managing the GKE clusters much smoother.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
7 months ago
Exactly, and we can ensure better network isolation and security with this approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
7 months ago
That way we can avoid any potential issues with IP address exhaustion in our enterprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
7 months ago
We should stick to Google's recommended practices and use privately used public IP space for the new clusters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
7 months ago
Definitely, it could lead to conflicts and make troubleshooting a nightmare.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
7 months ago
I agree, reusing the secondary address range for multiple clusters doesn't seem like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel