Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 5 Question 65 Discussion

Posted by Ezekiel on Feb 27, 2023 at 06:47 PM

Your company runs an enterprise platform on-premises using virtual machines (VMS). Your internet customers have created tens of thousands of DNS domains panting to your public IP addresses allocated to the Vtvls Typically, your customers hard-code your IP addresses In their DNS records You are now planning to migrate the platform to Compute Engine and you want to use Bring your Own IP you want to minimize disruption to the Platform What Should you d0?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
CO
Corrie 11 months ago
C could work, but it might complicate things with the existing setup.
JU
Justa 11 months ago
Option A is too much hassle with notifying customers.
EL
Eleni 12 months ago
Surprised that they can bring their own IPs like this!
SH
Shawnda 12 months ago
I disagree, I think option D is more efficient with live migration.
RU
Ruthann 1 year ago
Option B seems like the best choice for minimizing disruption.
ST
Stephen 1 year ago
Option C seems like it could work since it mentions creating a VPC with the same IP range, but I’m not sure if that would actually help with the migration process. I need to think more about how that aligns with the requirements.
KI
Kiley 1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m worried about the potential disruption it could cause. We discussed how hard-coding IPs can complicate migrations, so I’m not sure if notifying customers is enough.
LO
Loreta 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to consider minimizing downtime. I feel like option D might be the right choice because of the live migration aspect, but I’m not completely confident.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
I think option B sounds familiar since it mentions verifying ownership of IP addresses, which we covered in class. But I'm not entirely sure about the specifics of how that process works.
PE
Pearly 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The best strategy is to contact the sender and confirm they meant to send the file. Better safe than sorry!
HE
Herminia 1 year ago
I'm confident that the answer is 1,000,000 milligrams. The key is remembering that 1 kilogram is equal to 1,000 grams, and each gram is 1,000 milligrams.
MI
Mindy 1 year ago
Ha, imagine if the cusMargeryers were all, 'Wait, you want me to update my DNS records? Good luck with that!' Option A might be the safest bet.
MO
Monroe 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mindy
A) Create a VPC and request static external IP addresses from Google Cloud Assign the IP addresses to the Compute Engine instances. Notify your customers of the new IP addresses so they can update their DNS
JE
Jeniffer 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mindy
B) Verify ownership of your IP addresses. After the verification, Google Cloud advertises and provisions the IP prefix for you. Assign the IP addresses to the Compute Engine Instances
NO
Norah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mindy
A) Create a VPC and request static external IP addresses from Google Cloud Assign the IP addresses to the Compute Engine instances. Notify your customers of the new IP addresses so they can update their DNS
HA
Hayley 1 year ago
Option C is intriguing, but I'm not sure creating a VPC with the same IP range as the on-premises network is the best idea. Seems like it could get a bit messy.
LO
Lourdes 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hayley
That way, you can notify your customers of the new IP addresses and minimize disruption to the platform.
ER
Erasmo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hayley
I agree, it might be safer to go with Option A and request static external IP addresses from Google Cloud.
RU
Rutha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hayley
Option C could potentially cause IP conflicts with your on-premises network.
MA
Margery 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option D. Live migration of the IP prefix sounds like it could minimize disruption to the platform.
JU
Judy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
After that, assigning them to Compute Engine instances should be straightforward.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
It's important to verify ownership of the IP addresses first.
ME
Merlyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
I agree, live migration could be the way to go.
BO
Bo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
Option D sounds like a good choice for minimizing disruption.
JO
Johna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
Once that's done, we can assign the IP addresses to the Compute Engine instances.
RO
Romana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
It's important to verify ownership of the IP addresses before proceeding.
CH
Chantell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
I agree, live migration of the IP prefix seems like the way to go.
CH
Cherry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
Option D sounds like a good choice for minimizing disruption.
LE
Leonida 1 year ago
I'm not sure, option D also sounds like a good solution to me.
KR
Kris 2 years ago
I agree with Xuan, option A seems like the best choice to minimize disruption.
DE
Derick 2 years ago
Hmm, option B seems like the way to go. Verifying ownership and then letting Google Cloud handle the IP prefix migration sounds like the most straightforward approach.
EL
Elke 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
Yeah, it definitely seems like the most efficient way to minimize disruption during the migration process.
BE
Beatriz 1 year ago
↳ replying to Derick
I agree, option B sounds like the best choice. Letting Google Cloud handle the IP prefix migration would save us a lot of time and effort.
XU
Xuan 2 years ago
I think we should go with option A.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel