BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Exam Professional Cloud Developer Topic 2 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Developer exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Developer Questions]

You are a developer at a large organization. Your team uses Git for source code management (SCM). You want to ensure that your team follows Google-recommended best practices to manage code to drive higher rates of software delivery. Which SCM process should your team use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Francesco at Jul 08, 2024, 10:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Herman
3 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Gotta love those fancy 'change advisory boards' - makes me feel like I'm in a corporate spy movie or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
3 months ago
Haha, Option A sounds like a recipe for disaster. Committing directly to the main branch? No testing? What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Adelina
2 months ago
Yeah, Option D also sounds good. Having a feature branch for each group's work adds an extra layer of control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
3 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like a safer approach. Each developer creating their own branch for work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
3 months ago
Option A does sound risky. No testing before committing to the main branch is a bad idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
3 months ago
I think option A is the most efficient. Committing directly to the main branch before release simplifies the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
3 months ago
I prefer option C. It allows developers to work independently and merge changes daily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
4 months ago
I like Option C. Daily merges into the main branch keep things moving, and it's a good balance between individual work and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
4 months ago
Definitely going with Option D. Feature branches and change approvals ensure code quality and reduce integration issues.
upvoted 0 times
Adrianna
2 months ago
I agree, having a separate branch for each feature helps keep things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 months ago
It's important to get approval before merging to main to prevent any issues. Option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
2 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Feature branches and approvals are key for code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
2 months ago
Yes, following best practices like feature branches can really help with software delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
3 months ago
I agree, it's important to have a process in place for code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
3 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Feature branches and approvals are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
4 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. It's important to keep the main branch stable and have developers work on their own branches.
upvoted 0 times
Desirae
3 months ago
Yes, creating branches for each developer's work helps keep the main branch stable and allows for easier code integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
3 months ago
I agree, option C is definitely the best practice for managing code in Git.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
4 months ago
I agree with Cecilia. Option D ensures that changes are approved before merging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
4 months ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel