Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud Developer Exam - Topic 2 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Developer exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Developer Questions]

You are a developer at a large organization. Your team uses Git for source code management (SCM). You want to ensure that your team follows Google-recommended best practices to manage code to drive higher rates of software delivery. Which SCM process should your team use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Francesco at Jul 08, 2024, 10:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Niesha
4 months ago
Wait, can we really trust these methods? What if they lead to more conflicts?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
4 months ago
A is definitely the best practice according to Google!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
4 months ago
I thought we were supposed to avoid merging directly into main?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
5 months ago
I disagree, D seems better with peer reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
5 months ago
Option A is the way to go! Feature branches are essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
5 months ago
I have a vague memory of copying repositories being a bad practice. I think option C is not recommended based on what we learned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Germaine
5 months ago
I recall a similar question about branching strategies, and I think merging after testing is crucial. So, maybe option B could work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option D might be the best choice since it emphasizes peer review, which we practiced in our last session.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
6 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of feature branches in our last study group. I think option A aligns with that practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
6 months ago
Option D sounds like a good approach to me. Doing individual branches and getting peer review before merging to the main branch seems like a solid way to manage code changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question mentions Google-recommended best practices, but I'm not totally familiar with those. I'll have to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
6 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about Git branching strategies. I think the Google-recommended best practice is to use feature branches, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
6 months ago
I'm confident that option A is the right answer here. Creating feature branches, committing to those, and then merging to the main branch is a well-established Git workflow that aligns with industry best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
6 months ago
This seems like a pretty standard user management task in Ansible. I'll just follow the instructions carefully, make sure I have all the required files, and run the playbook with the vault password. Shouldn't be too difficult as long as I pay attention to the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
6 months ago
I think Sarah might be right. The basis is usually just the amount the taxpayer paid to acquire the property, which in this case would be the $40,000 cash payment. The mortgage and title insurance are separate costs that wouldn't be included in the basis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
2 years ago
Option D is the way to go. Gotta love those fancy 'change advisory boards' - makes me feel like I'm in a corporate spy movie or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
2 years ago
Haha, Option A sounds like a recipe for disaster. Committing directly to the main branch? No testing? What could go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Adelina
2 years ago
Yeah, Option D also sounds good. Having a feature branch for each group's work adds an extra layer of control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
2 years ago
I agree, Option C seems like a safer approach. Each developer creating their own branch for work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
2 years ago
Option A does sound risky. No testing before committing to the main branch is a bad idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
2 years ago
I think option A is the most efficient. Committing directly to the main branch before release simplifies the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
2 years ago
I prefer option C. It allows developers to work independently and merge changes daily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
2 years ago
I like Option C. Daily merges into the main branch keep things moving, and it's a good balance between individual work and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
2 years ago
Definitely going with Option D. Feature branches and change approvals ensure code quality and reduce integration issues.
upvoted 0 times
Adrianna
2 years ago
I agree, having a separate branch for each feature helps keep things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 years ago
It's important to get approval before merging to main to prevent any issues. Option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
2 years ago
Option D is the way to go. Feature branches and approvals are key for code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
2 years ago
Yes, following best practices like feature branches can really help with software delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to have a process in place for code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
2 years ago
Option D is the way to go. Feature branches and approvals are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
2 years ago
Option C seems like the way to go. It's important to keep the main branch stable and have developers work on their own branches.
upvoted 0 times
Desirae
2 years ago
Yes, creating branches for each developer's work helps keep the main branch stable and allows for easier code integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
2 years ago
I agree, option C is definitely the best practice for managing code in Git.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
2 years ago
I agree with Cecilia. Option D ensures that changes are approved before merging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
2 years ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel