Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Architect Topic 5 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 5
[All Professional Cloud Architect Questions]

You are working at an institution that processes medical dat

a. You are migrating several workloads onto Google Cloud. Company policies require all workloads to run on physically separated hardware, and workloads from different clients must also be separated You created a sole-tenant node group and added a node for each client. You need to deploy the workloads on these dedicated hosts. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/nodes/provisioning-sole-tenant-vms#provision_a_sole-tenant_vm

https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/nodes/provisioning-sole-tenant-vms#gcloud_2

When you create a VM, you request sole-tenancy by specifying node affinity or anti-affinity, referencing one or more node affinity labels. You specify custom node affinity labels when you create a node template, and Compute Engine automatically includes some default affinity labels on each node. By specifying affinity when you create a VM, you can schedule VMs together on a specific node or nodes in a node group. By specifying anti-affinity when you create a VM, you can ensure that certain VMs are not scheduled together on the same node or nodes in a node group.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Elena
1 months ago
Ah, the old 'let's make everything as manual and complicated as possible' approach. Hard pass, I'm going with C and saving myself a headache.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
1 months ago
I'm not sure. Should we also consider adding the node group name as a network tag?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
2 months ago
I chuckled at the 'node name as a tag' option. It's like they're trying to make our lives harder! C is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
Haha, trying to use the node name as a tag? That's a good way to end up with a complete mess on your hands. C is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Alishia
6 days ago
Agreed, it's the most efficient way to deploy workloads on dedicated hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
11 days ago
Definitely, it's important to keep workloads separated correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
15 days ago
Yeah, using node affinity labels based on the node group name makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracie
20 days ago
I think C is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elroy
2 months ago
Whoa, using individual node names as tags? That's just asking for trouble. Node affinity labels with the group name is the smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
2 months ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. Tagging the instances with the node group name would be way too manual and error-prone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
2 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go here. Using node affinity labels with the node group name is the best way to ensure each workload is deployed on the correct dedicated host.
upvoted 0 times
Rodrigo
27 days ago
Absolutely, it's crucial to maintain that level of separation and organization when dealing with sensitive medical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
1 months ago
Using node affinity labels based on the node group name will help keep everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 months ago
It's important to follow company policies and keep workloads separated on physically separated hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
1 months ago
I agree, option C is the most efficient way to deploy workloads on dedicated hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Horace
2 months ago
I agree with Tijuana. It's important to host each workload on the correct node group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
2 months ago
I think we should use node affinity labels based on the node group name.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel