Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Associate Cloud Engineer Topic 1 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Associate Cloud Engineer exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 1
[All Associate Cloud Engineer Questions]

Your manager asks you to deploy a workload to a Kubernetes cluster. You are not sure of the workloads resource requirements or how the requirements might vary depending on usage patterns, external dependencies, or other factors. You need a solution that makes cost-effective recommendations regarding CPU and memory requirements, and allows the workload to function consistently in any situation. You want to follow Google-recommended practices. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jose
27 days ago
Hey, have you heard the one about the Kubernetes engineer who tried to use the Vertical Pod Autoscaler for availability? Talk about a recipe for a cluster meltdown! Anyway, Option B gets my vote.
upvoted 0 times
Krissy
10 days ago
Yeah, Option B seems like the safest choice to follow Google-recommended practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
22 days ago
I agree, using the Vertical Pod Autoscaler for availability sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annamae
1 months ago
Option B all the way! Horizontal Pod Autoscaler for availability, Vertical Pod Autoscaler for resource recommendations. Can't go wrong with that. Although, I do wonder if the Cluster Autoscaler could be useful for some extra suggestions...
upvoted 0 times
Shaun
8 days ago
Definitely, option B covers all the bases. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler and Vertical Pod Autoscaler for the win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
11 days ago
Yeah, I think following Google-recommended practices is the way to go. Option B it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
19 days ago
I think the Cluster Autoscaler could provide some valuable suggestions as well, but sticking with option B is probably the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
22 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler for availability and Vertical Pod Autoscaler for resource recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karon
2 months ago
I'm not sure, I think Vertical Pod Autoscaler might be more suitable for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
2 months ago
I agree with Royal, Horizontal Pod Autoscaler seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
2 months ago
I don't know, man. Vertical Pod Autoscaler for availability? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. I'd go with Option B - it's the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
Krystina
22 days ago
Let's go with Option B then, it's the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 months ago
I agree, Vertical Pod Autoscaler for availability seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
1 months ago
I think Option B is the best choice. It's safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
2 months ago
I think we should go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Horizontal Pod Autoscaler for availability and Vertical Pod Autoscaler for resource recommendations - that's the Google-recommended way to do it, right?
upvoted 0 times
Fabiola
28 days ago
I'll make sure to configure the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler for availability and the Vertical Pod Autoscaler for resource recommendations. Thanks for the advice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
30 days ago
Definitely. Following Google-recommended practices will help optimize resource usage and cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
1 months ago
That's good to know. It's important to have the workload function consistently in any situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
2 months ago
Yes, option B is the Google-recommended way. It ensures availability with Horizontal Pod Autoscaler and provides resource recommendations with Vertical Pod Autoscaler.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel