While maintaining the gist history, which of the following is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist?
Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.
Forking a Gist:
Option A is correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.
Incorrect Options:
Option B is incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.
Option C is incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.
Option D is incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.
Regenia
1 months agoCherry
1 months agoAgustin
12 days agoVal
15 days agoDaron
26 days agoJacki
1 months agoAudrie
2 months agoReita
5 days agoElly
9 days agoTawanna
11 days agoMarylin
30 days agoHillary
2 months agoTamar
21 days agoJeannine
1 months agoVeronika
1 months agoPearly
2 months agoTommy
1 months agoSang
1 months agoTheron
1 months agoCherilyn
2 months agoVanesa
2 months agoTanja
2 months agoAlana
2 months agoFranklyn
2 months ago