While maintaining the gist history, which of the following is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist?
Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.
Forking a Gist:
Option A is correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.
Incorrect Options:
Option B is incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.
Option C is incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.
Option D is incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.
Regenia
6 months agoCherry
6 months agoAgustin
5 months agoVal
5 months agoDaron
6 months agoJacki
6 months agoAudrie
6 months agoReita
5 months agoElly
5 months agoTawanna
5 months agoMarylin
6 months agoHillary
7 months agoTamar
5 months agoJeannine
6 months agoVeronika
6 months agoPearly
7 months agoTommy
6 months agoSang
6 months agoTheron
6 months agoCherilyn
6 months agoVanesa
7 months agoTanja
7 months agoAlana
6 months agoFranklyn
7 months ago