While maintaining the gist history, which of the following is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist?
Forking a gist is the most efficient way to create a public gist based on another user's gist while maintaining the history of the original gist. When you fork a gist, you create a new gist in your own account that retains a link to the original, allowing you to track changes and contribute back if desired.
Forking a Gist:
Option A is correct because forking is a straightforward way to create your own copy of another user's gist while preserving the history and making it easy to track updates.
Incorrect Options:
Option B is incorrect because creating a new gist and copying the content would not preserve the history or link back to the original gist.
Option C is incorrect because cloning is typically associated with repositories, not gists, and is more complex than forking for this purpose.
Option D is incorrect because requesting to be added to the existing gist is not a standard GitHub feature.
Regenia
9 months agoCherry
9 months agoAgustin
8 months agoVal
8 months agoDaron
8 months agoJacki
9 months agoAudrie
9 months agoReita
8 months agoElly
8 months agoTawanna
8 months agoMarylin
9 months agoHillary
9 months agoTamar
8 months agoJeannine
9 months agoVeronika
9 months agoPearly
10 months agoTommy
9 months agoSang
9 months agoTheron
9 months agoCherilyn
9 months agoVanesa
10 months agoTanja
10 months agoAlana
9 months agoFranklyn
9 months ago