Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GIAC Exam GISP Topic 5 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for GIAC's GISP exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 5
[All GISP Questions]

Which of the following evidences are the collection of facts that, when considered together, can be used to infer a conclusion about the malicious activity/person?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Andra at Aug 26, 2024, 01:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GISP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Leonard
5 months ago
I'm going with B) Circumstantial. It's like a game of Connect the Dots, but with shady people instead of pictures.
upvoted 0 times
Sunshine
4 months ago
C) Direct evidence is hard to argue against, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
5 months ago
I think A) Corroborating evidence can also help strengthen the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
5 months ago
I agree, B) Circumstantial evidence can be very telling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sophia
6 months ago
I agree with Casandra, circumstantial evidence can be very convincing in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
6 months ago
But direct evidence is not always available, circumstantial evidence can still be strong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is C) Direct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
6 months ago
Definitely B) Circumstantial. It's like solving a mystery, you know? Put all the clues together and figure out what really happened.
upvoted 0 times
Werner
5 months ago
Yeah, it's all about piecing together the puzzle to see the bigger picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
5 months ago
I agree, B) Circumstantial evidence can be very powerful in connecting the dots.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casandra
6 months ago
I think the answer is B) Circumstantial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
6 months ago
I think the answer is B) Circumstantial. That's the type of evidence that can be used to draw conclusions about malicious activity.
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
5 months ago
Corroborating evidence can also strengthen a case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
5 months ago
I think direct evidence would be more convincing though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
6 months ago
I agree, circumstantial evidence can be very telling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel