BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Genesys Exam GE0-806 Topic 3 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Genesys's GE0-806 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 3
[All GE0-806 Questions]

Which set of factors would provide the basis for an optimal staffing calculation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Delmy at Sep 13, 2024, 02:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GE0-806 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Kimberely
28 days ago
I'm going with D. Minimum occupancy? That's my middle name! Well, actually, it's not, but it should be.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
5 days ago
User 3: D all the way! Minimum occupancy is where it's at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
13 days ago
User 2: I'm leaning towards A. Actual ASA and coverage are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
13 days ago
Predicted interaction volume and potential AHT are also crucial factors to consider for optimal staffing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
15 days ago
I think C is the way to go. Service objectives are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
20 days ago
Minimum occupancy is important for sure. It helps in planning the staffing levels effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
23 days ago
I'm going with D. Minimum occupancy? That's my middle name! Well, actually, it's not, but it should be.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
1 months ago
C is the clear winner here. Who needs actual ASA or coverage when you've got the service objectives to guide you?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
1 months ago
Option B, all the way! Actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and indirectly occupied time - that's the secret sauce for optimal staffing, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Lili
3 days ago
User 3: Definitely, having the right data on actual interaction volume and AHT is key to ensuring we have the right number of staff on hand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
5 days ago
User 2: I agree, those factors are crucial for calculating staffing needs accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
9 days ago
User 1: Option B, all the way! Actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and indirectly occupied time - that's the secret sauce for optimal staffing, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kiley
1 months ago
D seems like the way to go. Predicted interaction volume, potential AHT, and minimum occupancy - that's the formula for success!
upvoted 0 times
Tamesha
5 days ago
User 4: Tamesha has a point. D does seem like a good formula for success in staffing calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
6 days ago
User 3: I'm leaning towards D. Predicted interaction volume, potential AHT, and minimum occupancy make sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
13 days ago
User 2: I agree with Samira. C seems like a solid choice for optimal staffing calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
26 days ago
I think C is the best option. Actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and the service objectives are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I think option C is the right choice. Actual interaction volume, actual AHT, and the service objectives seem like the key factors to consider for optimal staffing.
upvoted 0 times
France
18 days ago
True, all the options have valid points to consider when calculating optimal staffing levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
23 days ago
I think option D could also be important, as predicted interaction volume and potential AHT can help with planning for future needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
1 months ago
But what about option A? Actual ASA and coverage are also crucial for determining staffing needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems to cover all the important factors for staffing calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlie
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but D also seems like a possible answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
2 months ago
I agree with Ollie, because service objectives are important for staffing calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
2 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel