GAQM Exam CBAF-001 Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 2

A business analyst has identified that one of the use cases on a use case diagram contains a large amount of optional processing. This optional processing is so large that he has decided to remove it to a separate use case which can be called by the original use case if required. How should the original use case be linked to the new use case?

ABy a broken, arrowed line stereotypedwith the word include.

BBy a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word uses.

CBy a solid line with no arrowhead or stereotype.

DBy a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lai at Mar 08, 2024, 11:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shawn

2 days ago

But wouldn't using 'include' make more sense since the optional processing is being separated out?

upvoted 0 times

...

Delila

3 days ago

I disagree, I believe it should be linked by a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

4 days ago

I think the original use case should be linked to the new use case by a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word include.

upvoted 0 times

...