Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Topic 5 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_ZTA-7.2 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 5
[All NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Questions]

FortiNAC has alarm mappings configured for MDM compliance failure, and FortiClient EMS is added as a MDM connector When an endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS, what action does FortiNAC perform?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In the scenario where FortiNAC has alarm mappings configured for MDM (Mobile Device Management) compliance failure and FortiClient EMS (Endpoint Management System) is integrated as an MDM connector, the typical response when an endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS is to isolate the host in the registration VLAN. This action is consistent with FortiNAC's approach to network access control, focusing on ensuring network security and compliance. By moving the non-compliant or quarantined host to a registration VLAN, FortiNAC effectively segregates it from the rest of the network, mitigating potential risks while allowing for further investigation or remediation steps. Reference: FortiNAC documentation, MDM Compliance and Response Actions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Merilyn
19 days ago
I believe the correct answer is A) The host is isolated in the registration VLAN, to ensure network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
21 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be B) The host is marked at risk, as a precautionary measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
29 days ago
I agree with Catalina, because FortiNAC would want to isolate the endpoint to prevent any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) The host is isolated in the registration VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the developers at Fortinet had a field day coming up with these answer choices. 'The host is marked as a high-risk unicorn' would have been a real curveball!
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
1 months ago
I'm going with C. Forcing the host to authenticate again ensures the device meets security requirements before regaining full network access. Seems like the right move to me.
upvoted 0 times
Cory
3 days ago
I agree with you, B makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
11 days ago
I think B is the correct answer. Marking the host at risk seems like a logical response.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Suzan
1 months ago
D has to be the correct answer. Disabling the host is a common security measure when a device fails compliance checks. Isolating it or forcing re-authentication doesn't seem as appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 months ago
I think the answer is B. FortiNAC marks the host as at-risk when the endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS. It's a logical action to take in response to a compliance failure.
upvoted 0 times
Lashaun
21 days ago
No, it's just marked as at-risk for further investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
27 days ago
So, the host won't be disabled immediately?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
1 months ago
Yes, that's correct. It's a way to respond to compliance failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
1 months ago
I believe the answer is B. FortiNAC marks the host as at-risk when quarantined by FortiClient EMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel