Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_ZTA-7.2 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 3
[All NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Questions]

FortiNAC has alarm mappings configured for MDM compliance failure, and FortiClient EMS is added as a MDM connector When an endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS, what action does FortiNAC perform?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In the scenario where FortiNAC has alarm mappings configured for MDM (Mobile Device Management) compliance failure and FortiClient EMS (Endpoint Management System) is integrated as an MDM connector, the typical response when an endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS is to isolate the host in the registration VLAN. This action is consistent with FortiNAC's approach to network access control, focusing on ensuring network security and compliance. By moving the non-compliant or quarantined host to a registration VLAN, FortiNAC effectively segregates it from the rest of the network, mitigating potential risks while allowing for further investigation or remediation steps. Reference: FortiNAC documentation, MDM Compliance and Response Actions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Margot
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. But I bet the exam writer is having a blast coming up with these tricky questions! Maybe they should consider a career in stand-up comedy instead.
upvoted 0 times
Noelia
28 days ago
C) The host is forced to authenticate again
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
1 months ago
B) The host is marked at risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 months ago
A) The host is isolated in the registration VLAN
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aracelis
2 months ago
I'm going with C. Forcing the host to re-authenticate seems like the best way to ensure the endpoint regains compliance before being allowed back on the network.
upvoted 0 times
Deangelo
23 days ago
C seems like a reasonable choice. Re-authenticating the host could fix any compliance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could be a possibility. Disabling the host would definitely secure the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 months ago
I agree with A. Isolating the host in the registration VLAN would prevent any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. Marking the host at risk would be a good precaution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emerson
2 months ago
D has to be the right answer. Disabling the host is the appropriate action when an endpoint is quarantined due to non-compliance. Gotta keep those risky devices off the network!
upvoted 0 times
Cortney
2 months ago
D) The host is disabled
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
2 months ago
B) The host is marked at risk
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
2 months ago
A) The host is isolated in the registration VLAN
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karol
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. FortiNAC marks the host as at risk when FortiClient EMS quarantines the endpoint. It's a logical response to a compliance failure.
upvoted 0 times
Lizbeth
2 months ago
I see your point. It's all about balancing security and usability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
2 months ago
That's true, but maybe marking it at risk allows for further investigation before taking drastic action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 months ago
But wouldn't isolating the host in the registration VLAN be a more secure option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
3 months ago
I agree, FortiNAC marking the host as at risk makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivan
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) The host is marked at risk because it helps to identify potential security threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) The host is isolated in the registration VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel