Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_SDW-7.2 Topic 2 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_SDW-7.2 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 2
[All NSE7_SDW-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the Exhibits:

Exhibit A, which shows the SD-WAN performance SLA and exhibit B shows the health of the participating SD-WAN members.

Based on the exhibits, which statement is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alecia
2 months ago
Option D is the winner! The FortiGate must have been on a coffee break when it should have been checking in with the SLA server. Someone needs to teach it the importance of punctuality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
D is the way to go. Clearly, the FortiGate is playing hide-and-seek with the SLA server, but it can't fool me!
upvoted 0 times
Lorriane
1 months ago
Definitely, option D explains why the SLA server is not responding to the FortiGate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
1 months ago
Yeah, it looks like the FortiGate is having trouble communicating with the SLA server on port2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
1 months ago
I agree, option D seems to be the most accurate based on the exhibits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oretha
2 months ago
I'd go with option B. Waiting 500ms to change the status from alive to dead seems like a reasonable safeguard against flapping.
upvoted 0 times
Viki
1 months ago
Option B does seem like a good safeguard against flapping. It's important for stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
2 months ago
I agree, having a delay can prevent unnecessary status changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tony
2 months ago
I think option B makes sense. It's important to have a delay before changing the status.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgina
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The health of the SD-WAN members seems a bit concerning. Maybe they need to call the IT guy who knows how to fix these things - you know, the one who's always 'working on it'.
upvoted 0 times
Josephine
2 months ago
Maybe they should check the configuration settings to see if everything is set up correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It seems like there might be an issue with the communication between the FortiGate and the SLA server.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
2 months ago
I think option D is correct. The FortiGate has not received three consecutive requests from the SLA server for port2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dante
3 months ago
Option D looks correct to me. The SLA server didn't receive three consecutive requests from port2, so it's marked as dead.
upvoted 0 times
Lindy
2 months ago
Yes, that's how it seems based on the information provided in the exhibits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
2 months ago
So, the FortiGate will keep port2 unavailable until it receives those requests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
2 months ago
That makes sense. It would explain why port2 is marked as dead in the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
2 months ago
I think option D is correct. The SLA server didn't receive three consecutive requests from port2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dahlia
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A) The dead member interface stays unavailable until an administrator manually brings the interface back, could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
3 months ago
I agree with Luis, because based on the exhibits, it seems like the most logical explanation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
3 months ago
I think the correct statement is D) FortiGate has not received three consecutive requests from the SLA server configured for port2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel