Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_OTS-7.2 Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_OTS-7.2 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_OTS-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

PLC-3 and CLIENT can send traffic to PLC-1 and PLC-2. FGT-2 has only one software switch (SSW-1) connecting both PLC-3 and CLIENT. PLC-3 and CLIENT cannot send traffic to each other.

Which two statements about the traffic between PCL-1 and PLC-2 are true? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Keva
2 months ago
Haha, this exam is definitely keeping us on our toes! I'd go with B and D, but I'm also curious about C. Maybe the FGT-EDGE is like the bouncer at the OT party, making sure everyone behaves before they get to the firewall.
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
1 months ago
Let's hope we both pass this exam with flying colors!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
2 months ago
Yeah, C is interesting. Maybe FGT-EDGE is the gatekeeper before traffic hits the firewall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
2 months ago
I think you're right, B and D seem like the correct choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
2 months ago
I agree, this exam is no joke!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tequila
2 months ago
Shouldn't option C be true as well? I mean, in OT networks, the traffic should be inspected by the FGT-EDGE, right? Otherwise, how will the firewall policies on FGT-2 be effective?
upvoted 0 times
Tawanna
1 months ago
Micro-segmentation on FGT-2 prevents direct device-to-device communication, which is crucial for securing the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
1 months ago
FGT-2 controls intra-VLAN traffic through firewall policies, so option D is important for communication between PLC-1 and PLC-2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 months ago
Option C is not necessary for traffic between PLC-1 and PLC-2. It's about traffic inspection in OT networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
1 months ago
C) Traffic must be inspected by FGT-EDGE in OT networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
2 months ago
B) Micro-segmentation on FGT-2 prevents direct device-to-device communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
2 months ago
A) The switch on FGT-2 must be hardware to implement micro-segmentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shonda
3 months ago
I agree with Brittni, B makes more sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
3 months ago
But micro-segmentation on FGT-2 prevents direct device-to-device communication, so it must be B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
3 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
3 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one. A hardware switch on FGT-2 doesn't seem necessary for micro-segmentation, so I'd rule out A. But the other two options sound plausible to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B and D. Micro-segmentation on FGT-2 should prevent direct device-to-device communication, and the firewall policies on FGT-2 would control the intra-VLAN traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Abraham
2 months ago
So, it looks like B and D are the right choices for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
2 months ago
And the firewall policies on FGT-2 would definitely control the intra-VLAN traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
3 months ago
Yes, micro-segmentation should indeed prevent direct device-to-device communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
3 months ago
I agree, B and D seem to be the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel