Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_WCS-7.0 Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_WCS-7.0 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All NSE6_WCS-7.0 Questions]

An administrator has been asked to deploy an active-passive (A-P) FortiGate cluster in the AWS cloud across two availability zones.

In addition to enhanced redundancy, which other major difference is there compared to deploying A-P high availability in the same availability zone?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Enhanced Redundancy:

Deploying an active-passive (A-P) FortiGate cluster across two availability zones (AZs) provides enhanced redundancy by ensuring that if one AZ fails, the other can take over, maintaining high availability and uptime.

IP Addressing and Subnetting:

One of the major differences when deploying across different AZs compared to the same AZ is that IP addressing and subnetting are not shared between the instances. Each AZ operates independently with its own set of subnets and IP addresses, which must be managed separately (Option D).

Other Options Analysis:

Option A is incorrect because the FortiGate devices in an A-P setup do not act as a single logical instance; they operate in a failover setup.

Option B is incorrect because secondary IP address configuration is used in both single AZ and multi-AZ deployments.

Option C is incorrect because the number of subnets required is typically more when deploying across multiple AZs for redundancy.


FortiGate HA Configuration Guide: FortiGate HA

AWS Availability Zones: AWS AZ

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lezlie
5 days ago
That's true, but having the devices act as a single instance simplifies management and configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
5 days ago
I bet the answer is B. Secondary IP address configuration is used to handle the failover between the two FortiGates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
9 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'm leaning towards D, since IP addressing and subnetting are not shared in a cross-AZ deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
10 days ago
But wouldn't using secondary IP address configuration also enhance redundancy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
17 days ago
I agree with Lezlie, having the devices act as a single instance provides better redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
22 days ago
I think the major difference is that the FortiGate devices act as a single, logical instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
24 days ago
I think the answer is A. The FortiGate devices act as a single, logical instance when deployed across availability zones.
upvoted 0 times
Maira
4 days ago
Yes, that's correct. It provides enhanced redundancy and acts as a single unit across availability zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
6 days ago
Yes, that's correct. It provides a seamless failover between availability zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
7 days ago
A) The FortiGate devices act as a single, logical instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
13 days ago
A) The FortiGate devices act as a single, logical instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel