Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FWF-6.4 Topic 4 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FWF-6.4 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 4
[All NSE6_FWF-6.4 Questions]

Six APs are located in a remotely based branch office and are managed by a centrally hosted FortiGate. Multiple wireless users frequently connect and roam between the APs in the remote office.

The network they connect to, is secured with WPA2-PSK. As currently configured, the WAN connection between the branch office and the centrally hosted FortiGate is unreliable.

Which configuration would enable the most reliable wireless connectivity for the remote clients?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Look for ''Continued FortiAP operation when WiFi controller connection is down'' im the link here: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortiap/7.0.4/fortiwifi-and-fortiap-configuration-guide/442078/how-to-configure-a-fortiap-local-bridge-private-cloud-managed-ap


by Val at Feb 09, 2025, 05:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FWF-6.4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Aleshia
1 months ago
Wait, is split tunneling really a thing? That sounds like a recipe for disaster. I'd go with the local authentication setup for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the network admin is pulling their hair out with this unreliable WAN link. Bridge mode with local auth is probably the most practical fix.
upvoted 0 times
Marva
2 days ago
True, the network admin definitely has their work cut out for them with this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
3 days ago
I think installing supported FortiAP and configuring a bridge mode wireless network could also improve reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
13 days ago
But wouldn't configuring a tunnel mode wireless network with split tunneling also help with the unreliable WAN connection?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
20 days ago
I agree, bridge mode with local authentication seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaycee
2 months ago
But wouldn't configuring a tunnel mode network with split tunneling also help in ensuring reliable connectivity?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
2 months ago
I agree, installing supported FortiAP and configuring a bridge mode network would provide the most reliable connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
2 months ago
Installing FortiAP seems like the most robust solution. Then you can take advantage of the integration with the FortiGate for centralized management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
2 months ago
I'm not sure about split tunneling. Isn't that a security risk? I'd lean towards the local authentication option for more reliable connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
28 days ago
Let's go with local authentication for better connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
1 months ago
I agree, local authentication sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
1 months ago
Local authentication option might be more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
1 months ago
I think split tunneling can be a security risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosann
2 months ago
I think option D would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
2 months ago
Bridge mode with local authentication sounds like the way to go. Keeping the wireless traffic local should help with the unreliable WAN connection.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
2 months ago
Yes, keeping the wireless traffic local will definitely improve reliability for the remote clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
2 months ago
I agree, bridge mode with local authentication would definitely help in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel