Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FWB-6.4 Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FWB-6.4 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 4
[All NSE6_FWB-6.4 Questions]

An e-commerce web app is used by small businesses. Clients often access it from offices behind a router, where clients are on an IPv4 private network LAN. You need to protect the web application from denial of service attacks that use request floods.

What FortiWeb feature should you configure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Novella at Jun 21, 2024, 10:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FWB-6.4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marg
1 months ago
You know, I bet some of these candidates are going to try to outsmart the question and pick the most complex-sounding option. Classic exam strategy, but not always the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
1 months ago
Ha! I bet some candidates are going to get a kick out of option A. Shared IP? Rate limits for NATted IPs? Sounds like a recipe for comedy.
upvoted 0 times
Truman
11 days ago
User 1: Option A does sound a bit complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phil
1 months ago
I agree with Aretha, option A seems like the most effective solution in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
2 months ago
D, for sure. Configuring a server policy to handle shared Internet connections is the most comprehensive solution to protect against those pesky request floods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
2 months ago
C is my pick. Enabling SYN cookies is a classic way to mitigate DoS attacks by verifying the client's legitimacy. Simple but effective!
upvoted 0 times
Johnson
16 days ago
Definitely, SYN cookies are a simple yet effective method to mitigate denial of service attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
17 days ago
It's important to have measures in place to protect against DoS attacks, and enabling SYN cookies is a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
22 days ago
I agree, SYN cookies are a reliable way to verify client legitimacy and prevent flooding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
28 days ago
C is a good choice. SYN cookies can definitely help protect against DoS attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aretha
2 months ago
But option A specifically addresses protecting against request floods from NATted source IPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
2 months ago
Hmm, I think B is the way to go. Using the X-Forwarded-For headers to identify the private IP addresses and block attacks from there seems like a smart approach.
upvoted 0 times
Angelica
20 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it's a smart approach to protect the web app from denial of service attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
21 days ago
User 1: I agree, using X-Forwarded-For headers is a good idea to block attacks from private IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it seems like a smart way to protect the web application from denial of service attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, using X-Forwarded-For headers sounds like a good idea to block attacks from private IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aretha
2 months ago
I think we should go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel