Fortinet Exam NSE6_FSW-7.2 Topic 3 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam

Question #: 12
Topic #: 3

[All NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions]

Which packet capture method allows FortiSwitch to capture traffic on trunks and management interfaces?

ASPAN

BSniffer profile

CsFlow

DTCP dump

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Jesusa at Jul 14, 2024, 09:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Leila

4 months ago

Hmm, I'm gonna have to go with SPAN on this one. It's the Swiss Army knife of packet capture methods.

upvoted 0 times

Simona

3 months ago

TCP dump is a reliable method for capturing traffic as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

3 months ago

I've had success using Sniffer profiles for packet capture in the past.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

3 months ago

I think sFlow could also be a good choice for capturing traffic on trunks and management interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

3 months ago

I agree, SPAN is definitely a versatile option for packet capture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

4 months ago

TCP dump? What is this, the stone age? SPAN is the only choice that makes sense for a FortiSwitch setup.

upvoted 0 times

Annabelle

3 months ago

Yeah, SPAN is the best option for capturing traffic on trunks and management interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindy

3 months ago

I agree, SPAN is the most suitable method for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonda

4 months ago

SPAN is definitely the way to go for capturing traffic on FortiSwitch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

4 months ago

I agree with Chaya, sFlow seems like the right choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryln

4 months ago

Sniffer profile? Really? That's like trying to catch a fish with a butterfly net. SPAN is clearly the answer.

upvoted 0 times

Luisa

4 months ago

Definitely, SPAN is the best method for capturing traffic on trunks and management interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elliot

4 months ago

Sniffer profile is not as effective as SPAN.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgene

4 months ago

I agree, SPAN is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonor

4 months ago

SPAN is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

4 months ago

sFlow is a scalable packet capture method that can be used on switches, so I think it makes sense in this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cecil

5 months ago

I'm torn between SPAN and sFlow. Both seem like they could work, but SPAN just has that extra bit of flexibility that I think is crucial here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hannah

5 months ago

SPAN is definitely the way to go for capturing traffic on trunks and management interfaces. It's the most comprehensive option in this list.

upvoted 0 times

Jesusa

3 months ago

Yes, SPAN is the recommended method for capturing traffic on trunks and management interfaces. It provides a complete view of the network traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Milly

3 months ago

I agree, SPAN is the best choice for that. It's reliable and efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linette

3 months ago

SPAN is definitely the way to go for capturing traffic on trunks and management interfaces. It's the most comprehensive option in this list.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

3 months ago

Yes, SPAN is definitely the way to go for that type of packet capture.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

3 months ago

I agree, SPAN is the most comprehensive option available.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dallas

3 months ago

SPAN is the best choice for capturing traffic on trunks and management interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carla

5 months ago

Why do you think it's sFlow?

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

5 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's C) sFlow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carla

5 months ago

I think the answer is A) SPAN.

upvoted 0 times

...