I'm curious about the 'no executable file types' part. Does that mean the high aggressiveness settings can't even scan those types of files? That seems like a pretty significant limitation.
I'm not too worried about the disk space requirement. Disks are pretty cheap these days, so that doesn't seem like a major issue. But the other two points are definitely valid concerns. We need to find the right balance between security and performance.
Haha, yeah, that's a bit concerning. Imagine trying to explain to the boss why your antivirus can't even check the company's own executable files. 'Sorry, our security is too good for that!'
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the key disadvantages are the increased resource usage and the risk of more false positives. We don't want the system to be bogged down, and we definitely don't want to be drowning in false alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Lorrie
6 months agoDannette
6 months agoJill
6 months agoParis
6 months agoIvette
6 months agoMitsue
6 months agoOna
6 months agoLashaun
7 months agoOmer
7 months agoMaxima
7 months agoRosio
8 months agoCorinne
8 months agoLazaro
8 months agoJoye
8 months agoEdwin
8 months agoMarjory
8 months agoJaime
8 months agoOrville
8 months agoMammie
8 months agoNa
8 months ago