Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FAC-6.4 Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FAC-6.4 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All NSE6_FAC-6.4 Questions]

You are the administrator of a global enterprise with three FortiAuthenticator devices. You would like to deploy them to provide active-passive HA at headquarters, with geographically distributed load balancing.

What would the role settings be?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To deploy three FortiAuthenticator devices to provide active-passive HA at headquarters, with geographically distributed load balancing, the role settings would be:

One standalone primary, which acts as the master device for HA and load balancing

One cluster member, which acts as the backup device for HA and load balancing

One load balancer, which acts as a remote device that forwards authentication requests to the primary or cluster member device


by Reyes at Jun 30, 2024, 01:36 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FAC-6.4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shay
1 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Two cluster members and one load balancer - it's the ultimate 'Fortification' of your enterprise security!
upvoted 0 times
Christiane
1 months ago
I agree, having two cluster members for redundancy and one load balancer for load balancing is a solid configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
1 months ago
Option D is the best choice. Two cluster members and one load balancer will provide the most secure setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bev
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D sounds like the most logical choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam creator is a big fan of the Spice Girls. 'Wannabe' a load balancer? I'm sticking with D, two cluster members and one load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 months ago
Hmm, B seems the most logical to me. One standalone primary, one cluster member, and one load balancer. Covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
Rupert
1 months ago
I think B is the best option too. It provides a good balance of roles for the devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 months ago
I agree, B does seem like the most logical choice. It covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deandrea
2 months ago
I agree with Sherell, having two cluster members and one load balancer would provide the necessary redundancy and load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
2 months ago
I'm going with C. Two cluster members and one backup seems like a solid setup to ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
2 months ago
I think the role settings should be two cluster members and one load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
2 months ago
Option D looks like the right choice to me. Two cluster members and one load balancer should do the trick for active-passive HA and load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
Jess
1 months ago
I agree, having two cluster members for redundancy and one load balancer for distributing the load seems like a solid setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
Option D looks like the right choice to me. Two cluster members and one load balancer should do the trick for active-passive HA and load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel