Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE5_FSM-6.3 Topic 9 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE5_FSM-6.3 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 9
[All NSE5_FSM-6.3 Questions]

Which is a requirement for implementing FortiSIEM disaster recovery?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Disaster Recovery (DR) Implementation: For FortiSIEM to effectively support disaster recovery, specific requirements must be met to ensure seamless failover and data integrity.

Layer 2 Connectivity: One of the critical requirements for implementing FortiSIEM DR is that the two supervisor nodes must have layer 2 connectivity.

Layer 2 Connectivity: This ensures that the supervisors can communicate directly at the data link layer, which is necessary for synchronous data replication and other DR processes.

Importance of Connectivity: Layer 2 connectivity between the supervisor nodes ensures that they can maintain consistent and up-to-date state information, which is essential for a smooth failover in the event of a disaster.

References: FortiSIEM 6.3 Administration Guide, Disaster Recovery section, which details the requirements and configurations needed for setting up disaster recovery, including the necessity for layer 2 connectivity between supervisor nodes.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Bok
17 days ago
I'm torn between Options B and C, but I think I'll go with B. Open communication ports between the supervisors seems like a more fundamental requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Casie
9 days ago
User1: I agree, having open communication ports between the supervisors is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deonna
27 days ago
Haha, DNS names for worker upload addresses? That's just asking for trouble! Option D is definitely not the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Selma
2 days ago
User 2: Definitely, we should go with option A instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
3 days ago
User 1: I agree, using DNS names for worker upload addresses sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
1 months ago
I think D) DNS names must be used for the worker upload addresses makes more sense for seamless recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
1 months ago
But wouldn't having layer 2 connectivity limit the disaster recovery options?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) The two supervisor nodes must have layer 2 connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
1 months ago
I think the requirement is B) SNMP, and WMI ports must be open between the two supervisor nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 months ago
I'm going with Option C. Layer 2 connectivity between the two supervisor nodes is crucial for seamless failover in a disaster scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Curtis
20 days ago
I think using DNS names for worker upload addresses would also be important for easy failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
28 days ago
I agree, having layer 2 connectivity is essential for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chery
2 months ago
Option B seems to be the most logical requirement for disaster recovery. SNMP and WMI ports need to be open between the supervisor nodes for effective communication.
upvoted 0 times
Rodrigo
11 days ago
Definitely, it's a key requirement to consider when implementing FortiSIEM disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
19 days ago
Having that connectivity in place can make a big difference in how quickly and effectively the system can recover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
20 days ago
Yes, it ensures that the necessary data can be transferred between the nodes during a disaster recovery scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
24 days ago
I agree, having SNMP and WMI ports open is crucial for communication between supervisor nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel