BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE5_FCT-7.0 Topic 6 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE5_FCT-7.0 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 6
[All NSE5_FCT-7.0 Questions]

An administrator installs FortiClient on Windows Server.

What is the default behavior of real-time protection control?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Art at Apr 08, 2024, 07:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE5_FCT-7.0 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Niesha
4 months ago
Really? I didn't know that. Maybe it's better to enable it for added security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 months ago
Actually, I believe real-time protection is disabled by default on FortiClient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
4 months ago
I agree with It makes sense to keep the signature database up to date for better protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
5 months ago
I think the default behavior of real-time protection control is to update the AV signature database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
5 months ago
Based on the options, it seems like real-time protection sends malicious files to FortiSandbox when they are not detected locally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
5 months ago
But what if the file is not detected locally? Does it send it to FortiSandbox?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
5 months ago
I agree, it's important to keep the signature database up to date to protect against new threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
6 months ago
I think the default behavior is that real-time protection must update AV signature database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
7 months ago
Haha, I hear you, Valene. This question is really making me question my life choices. Maybe we should just start guessing and see what happens. After all, that's how I got through most of my college exams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
7 months ago
Hold on, I think I remember something about having to update the signature database from FortiSandbox. That sounds like the right answer to me. Let me double-check the documentation on that.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
6 months ago
Actually, I remember reading that real-time protection sends malicious files to FortiSandbox. So, I believe that's the default behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
6 months ago
Are you sure about that? I thought real-time protection sends malicious files to FortiSandbox when the file is not detected locally.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
6 months ago
I think the default behavior is that real-time protection must update the signature database from FortiSandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emiko
7 months ago
You guys are overthinking this. The real answer is that real-time protection is probably disabled by default on a Windows Server. Why would you need that kind of protection on a server?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
7 months ago
I'm not too sure about that. Wouldn't it make more sense for real-time protection to send any undetected malicious files to FortiSandbox for further analysis? That's what I would expect the default behavior to be.
upvoted 0 times
Nikita
6 months ago
C) Real-time protection is disabled
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
7 months ago
I see your point. It could be beneficial to update the signature database from FortiSandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
7 months ago
D) Real-time protection must update the signature database from FortiSandbox
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
7 months ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient to send unknown files to FortiSandbox?
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
7 months ago
A) Real-time protection must update AV signature database
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
7 months ago
That's a good point. It does make sense to send undetected files to FortiSandbox for further analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
7 months ago
B) Real-time protection sends malicious files to FortiSandbox when the file is not detected locally
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valene
7 months ago
You know, I'm starting to get a headache just thinking about this. Why are they asking us about the default behavior of real-time protection on a Windows Server? Shouldn't we be focused on more important topics, like how to optimize our FortiClient deployment for maximum security?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
7 months ago
Hold on, guys. Isn't option A also a possibility? I mean, the real-time protection would need to update the AV signature database to be effective, right? This question is really making me think.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
7 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the default behavior of real-time protection control is that it must update the AV signature database. That seems like the most logical option to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if the question is trying to trick us? I'm leaning towards option D - updating the signature database from FortiSandbox. That seems like a logical default behavior for real-time protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
7 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the correct answer. FortiClient's real-time protection is designed to send unknown or suspicious files to FortiSandbox for analysis, rather than just disabling the feature entirely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
7 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but it's important to understand the default behavior of FortiClient's real-time protection on a Windows Server. I'm thinking option B sounds like the most likely default behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel