Haha, yeah, that would be like cheating or something. Although, I do like the idea of not having to worry about the disk space usage. Maybe they'll throw us a curveball and that's the right answer!
You guys are really overthinking this, aren't you? I'm just going to go with option B. Disk space usage capped at 50% seems like a pretty straightforward statement to me.
Ah, I see what you mean. But didn't the question say the statement about the management extension is correct? I'm leaning towards option A, as it sounds like it covers the entire lifecycle of a threat or breach.
I'm not so sure about that, to be honest. Doesn't the FortiSIEM management extension require a licensed supervisor, according to the options? I think option C is the way to go here.
Ooh, I think Option C might be the winner here. Requiring a licensed FortiSIEM supervisor sounds like a pretty standard requirement for an enterprise-level tool like this.
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure about the FortiSIEM management extension, but I think option D might be the correct answer. Installing it as a dedicated VM makes sense, right?
Well, let's take a look at the options. Option A sounds promising, but I'm not sure if the FortiSIEM management extension really covers the entire life cycle of a threat or breach.
Marjory
10 months agoKami
10 months agoLaura
10 months agoLisandra
10 months agoKami
11 months agoAilene
11 months agoClare
11 months agoTiffiny
12 months agoAilene
12 months agoWayne
1 years agoMozell
1 years agoLucy
1 years agoLavelle
1 years agoColeen
1 years agoCaprice
1 years agoJimmie
1 years agoGregg
1 years agoLewis
1 years agoBulah
1 years agoLeota
11 months agoSherrell
11 months agoAnabel
11 months agoTomas
12 months agoGracia
12 months agoCarlene
12 months ago