Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE4_FGT-7.2 Topic 6 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE4_FGT-7.2 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 6
[All NSE4_FGT-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

In the network shown in the exhibit, the web client cannot connect to the HTTP web server. The administrator runs the FortiGate built-in sniffer and gets the output as shown in the exhibit.

What should the administrator do next to troubleshoot the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacquelyne
8 months ago
What about running a sniffer on the web server itself?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
9 months ago
I agree with Lindsay. Running another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10 could give more specific information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
9 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to capture the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
9 months ago
I think the administrator should execute another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
9 months ago
I think executing a debug flow would be the best approach to troubleshoot the problem thoroughly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
9 months ago
I agree with Murray, running another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10 might provide more insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe capturing the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1 would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
10 months ago
I think we should run a sniffer on the web server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
10 months ago
Yeah, I'm with you on that one. And hey, if that doesn't work, maybe we can try option D and do a debug flow. That could shed some light on the problem, although it might be a bit more technical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
10 months ago
I dunno, man. I'm leaning towards option C - executing another sniffer with the filter host 10.0.1.10. That could give us some more insight into what's going on with that specific IP address, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Tanja
10 months ago
Actually, I'm starting to agree with you. Executing another sniffer with the filter host 10.0.1.10 seems like a good idea now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
10 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
10 months ago
I see your point, but I still think capturing the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
10 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
10 months ago
No way, I disagree. The best approach would be to execute a debug flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
10 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
10 months ago
I think option A might be better, we should run a sniffer on the web server directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
10 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
11 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. The administrator's already run the FortiGate sniffer and got some output, but it doesn't seem to be solving the issue. I think we need to dig deeper here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
11 months ago
Whoa, this question is intense! I mean, the exhibit looks like a network diagram, and the issue is that the web client can't connect to the HTTP server. Talk about a headache-inducing problem!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel