New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE4_FGT-7.2 Topic 6 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE4_FGT-7.2 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 6
[All NSE4_FGT-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

In the network shown in the exhibit, the web client cannot connect to the HTTP web server. The administrator runs the FortiGate built-in sniffer and gets the output as shown in the exhibit.

What should the administrator do next to troubleshoot the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

This solution will help the administrator troubleshoot the problem by tracing the packet flow through the FortiGate device and displaying the details of each step.A debug flow can show the source and destination interfaces, the firewall policy, the routing table, the NAT translation, the security profiles, and the session information of the packet1. A debug flow can also show any errors or anomalies that occur during the packet processing.To execute a debug flow, the administrator can use the diagnose debug flow command in the CLI


by Angella at Mar 19, 2024, 03:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE4_FGT-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jacquelyne
6 months ago
What about running a sniffer on the web server itself?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
6 months ago
I agree with Lindsay. Running another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10 could give more specific information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
6 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to capture the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
6 months ago
I think the administrator should execute another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
7 months ago
I think executing a debug flow would be the best approach to troubleshoot the problem thoroughly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
7 months ago
I agree with Murray, running another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10 might provide more insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe capturing the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1 would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
7 months ago
I think we should run a sniffer on the web server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm with you on that one. And hey, if that doesn't work, maybe we can try option D and do a debug flow. That could shed some light on the problem, although it might be a bit more technical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
8 months ago
I dunno, man. I'm leaning towards option C - executing another sniffer with the filter host 10.0.1.10. That could give us some more insight into what's going on with that specific IP address, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Tanja
8 months ago
Actually, I'm starting to agree with you. Executing another sniffer with the filter host 10.0.1.10 seems like a good idea now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
8 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
8 months ago
I see your point, but I still think capturing the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
8 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
8 months ago
No way, I disagree. The best approach would be to execute a debug flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
8 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
8 months ago
I think option A might be better, we should run a sniffer on the web server directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
8 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
8 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. The administrator's already run the FortiGate sniffer and got some output, but it doesn't seem to be solving the issue. I think we need to dig deeper here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
8 months ago
Whoa, this question is intense! I mean, the exhibit looks like a network diagram, and the issue is that the web client can't connect to the HTTP server. Talk about a headache-inducing problem!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel