Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All FCP_FAZ_AN-7.4 Questions]

Refer to Exhibit:

What does the data point at 21:20 indicate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The exhibit shows a graph that tracks two metrics over time: Receive Rate and Insert Rate. These two rates are crucial for understanding the log processing behavior in FortiAnalyzer.

Understanding Receive Rate and Insert Rate:

Receive Rate: This is the rate at which FortiAnalyzer is receiving logs from connected devices.

Insert Rate: This is the rate at which FortiAnalyzer is indexing (inserting) logs into its database for storage and analysis.

Data Point at 21:20:

At 21:20, the Insert Rate line is above the Receive Rate line, indicating that FortiAnalyzer is inserting logs into its database at a faster rate than it is receiving them. This situation suggests that FortiAnalyzer is able to keep up with the incoming logs and is possibly processing a backlog or temporarily received logs faster than new logs are coming in.

Option Analysis:

Option A - FortiAnalyzer is Indexing Logs Faster Than Logs are Being Received: This accurately describes the scenario at 21:20, where the Insert Rate exceeds the Receive Rate. This indicates that FortiAnalyzer is handling logs efficiently at that moment, with no backlog in processing.

Option B - The fortilogd Daemon is Ahead in Indexing by One Log: The data does not provide specific information about the fortilogd daemon's log count, only the rates. This option is incorrect.

Option C - SQL Database Requires a Rebuild: High receive lag would imply a backlog in receiving and indexing logs, typically visible if the Receive Rate were significantly above the Insert Rate, which is not the case here.

Option D - FortiAnalyzer is Temporarily Buffering Logs to Index Older Logs First: There is no indication of buffering in this scenario. Buffering would usually occur if the Receive Rate were higher than the Insert Rate, indicating that FortiAnalyzer is storing logs temporarily due to indexing lag.

Conclusion:

Correct Answe r : A. FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than logs are being received.

The graph at 21:20 shows a higher Insert Rate than Receive Rate, indicating efficient log processing by FortiAnalyzer.


FortiAnalyzer 7.4.1 documentation on log processing metrics, Receive Rate, and Insert Rate indicators.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elmira
1 days ago
I think option D is the correct answer. FortiAnalyzer must be temporarily buffering received logs so older logs can be indexed first. Makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 days ago
I disagree, I believe it shows that the fortilogd daemon is ahead in indexing by one log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
3 days ago
I think the data point at 21:20 indicates that FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than logs are being received.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
9 days ago
The data point at 21:20 clearly shows that FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than they are being received. This is the most logical explanation based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
2 days ago
A) FortiAnalyzer is indexing logs faster than logs are being received.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel