Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301b Topic 3 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 3
[All 301b Questions]

-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibits.

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue with one of the virtual servers on an LTM device, and all requests are receiving errors. Testing directly against the server generates no errors. The LTM Specialist has captured the request and response on both client and server sides of the LTM device.

What should the LTM Specialist do to fix this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lai
14 days ago
Ah, the age-old problem of virtual server woes. I'd suggest the LTM Specialist try turning it off and on again. If that doesn't work, they can always blame it on the 'quantum fluctuations' in the network.
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
2 days ago
A) Remove 'header-erase Host' in http profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daisy
23 days ago
I'm stumped, but I'm gonna go with option B. SNAT Automap sounds like the kind of magic that could save the day, ya know?
upvoted 0 times
Danica
3 days ago
I'm not so sure about B. Maybe C or D could work better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
6 days ago
I think option B is the way to go too. SNAT Automap might just do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
28 days ago
This one's a tough nut to crack, but I reckon option D is the answer. Selective redirect-rewrite could be the key to resolving those pesky client-side errors.
upvoted 0 times
Alisha
2 days ago
Maybe we should consider Option C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
5 days ago
I think Option A might also work in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
15 days ago
Option D sounds like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aracelis
30 days ago
I think assigning OneConnect profile to the virtual server could be the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 months ago
I believe configuring SNAT Automap on the virtual server might also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
1 months ago
Hold up, I'd say option C is the way to go. Assigning a OneConnect profile should help with the connection pooling and improve the responsiveness.
upvoted 0 times
Cortney
3 days ago
Let's go with option C then. It seems like the most appropriate solution for this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
6 days ago
I think Option A might be better. Removing 'header-erase Host' could potentially solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
12 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It should improve the responsiveness of the virtual server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
24 days ago
Option C sounds like a good idea. OneConnect profile can definitely help with connection pooling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
26 days ago
I think option C is a good choice. OneConnect profile can definitely help with connection pooling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jessenia
1 months ago
I agree with Hoa, removing 'header-erase Host' could fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 months ago
I think the LTM Specialist should remove 'header-erase Host' in http profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
2 months ago
Hmm, looks like the issue is related to the HTTP profile. I'd try option A - removing the 'header-erase Host' setting. That might fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Clorinda
16 days ago
I agree. Setting 'redirect-rewrite' to 'selective' in the http profile might be worth trying as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
21 days ago
That's true. Assigning OneConnect profile could also improve the connection efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
1 months ago
But what if the issue is with the server-side connection? Maybe configuring SNAT Automap could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
1 months ago
I think option A is a good choice. Removing 'header-erase Host' might solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel