F5 Networks Exam 301a Topic 8 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 8

A company plans to launch a huge marketing campaign and expects increase demand of their secure website. With the current virtual server setup, the LTM Specialist expects that the LTM device will reach its capacity limits. For the wen application to function properly. Cookies persistence is required. The LTM Specialist needs to reduce LTM device load without breaking the application.

Which two settings should the LTM Specialist modify to meet the requirement? (Choose two.)

ARemove HTTP compression profile

BRemove HTTP profile

CRemove web acceleration profile.

DModify virtual Server type to performance (Layer 4)

ERemove ClientSSL profile

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

It is required that cookie persist must be used and http profile must be used, and SSL offloading must also be required. It must be in standard mode, excluding BD E.

by Tamar at Apr 12, 2024, 05:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301a Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lynsey

4 months ago

We should definitely consider removing the HTTP profile as well to meet the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

4 months ago

I think modifying the virtual server type to performance (Layer 4) could also help in reducing the LTM device load.

upvoted 0 times

...

Giuseppe

5 months ago

I agree with that. Another setting that could be modified is removing the web acceleration profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carman

5 months ago

I believe one of the settings that should be modified is removing the HTTP compression profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

5 months ago

Yeah, the LTM Specialist mentioned about reaching capacity limits with the current setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doyle

5 months ago

I think we need to modify some settings on the LTM device for the website to function properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maurine

5 months ago

I'm not sure about that. Removing the HTTP and web acceleration profiles seems like a safer option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selene

6 months ago

But what about modifying the virtual server type to performance (Layer 4)? Wouldn't that also help reduce the load?

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

6 months ago

I agree with Those settings might be adding unnecessary load to the LTM device.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maurine

6 months ago

I think we should remove the HTTP compression profile and the web acceleration profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

7 months ago

Hah, Louvenia is thinking outside the box! I like it. The web acceleration profile could definitely be the culprit here. But I'm still a little worried about the cookies persistence. Maybe a combination of that and the HTTP compression profile removal would be the best approach?

upvoted 0 times

Joanna

5 months ago

That sounds like a solid plan. Let's try removing both and see how the application performs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terina

6 months ago

I agree. And maybe removing the web acceleration profile as well could make a difference.

upvoted 0 times

...

Altha

6 months ago

Yeah, that could help reduce the load on the LTM device.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mary

6 months ago

I think removing the HTTP compression profile could be a good start.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

7 months ago

Ah, the age-old dilemma of performance vs. security. You guys are on the right track, but I've got a wild card for ya - what about disabling the web acceleration profile? That could free up some resources without compromising the cookies persistence or the secure connection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ludivina

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about the performance (Layer 4) option. Wouldn't that remove some of the security features? I think I'd go with the HTTP compression profile removal. It's less risky, and it could still help reduce the load.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

7 months ago

Ooh, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards modifying the virtual server type to performance (Layer 4) because that could reduce the load without affecting the cookies persistence. But I'm not 100% sure, maybe we should ask the LTM Specialist for more details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stanford

7 months ago

I agree with Lennie, those seem like the most viable options. Removing the HTTP profile or the web acceleration profile could potentially break the application, and removing the ClientSSL profile would defeat the purpose of the secure website.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lennie

7 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. The LTM Specialist needs to reduce the device load without breaking the application, and cookies persistence is required. I'm thinking either removing the HTTP compression profile or modifying the virtual server type to performance (Layer 4) might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...