Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301a Topic 2 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 2
[All 301a Questions]

A company plans to launch a huge marketing campaign and expects increase demand of their secure website. With the current virtual server setup, the LTM Specialist expects that the LTM device will reach its capacity limits. For the wen application to function properly. Cookies persistence is required. The LTM Specialist needs to reduce LTM device load without breaking the application.

Which two settings should the LTM Specialist modify to meet the requirement? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

It is required that cookie persist must be used and http profile must be used, and SSL offloading must also be required. It must be in standard mode, excluding BD E.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Coletta
7 days ago
But what about removing web acceleration profile? Wouldn't that also help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
13 days ago
Ah, the old 'remove the ClientSSL profile' trick. Classic. Next, they'll suggest we use a Speak-and-Spell to handle the encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
16 days ago
I agree with Billye. Those settings can help reduce the LTM device load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
19 days ago
Removing the web acceleration profile? Are they trying to turn the website into a dial-up era relic? No, that's not the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
28 days ago
Modifying the virtual server type to performance (Layer 4) seems like the way to go. Simplify things and let the LTM device focus on the essentials. That's a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Rodrigo
11 days ago
User 2: Agreed, that would help simplify things and reduce the load on the LTM device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
15 days ago
User 1: I think we should modify the virtual server type to performance (Layer 4).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dyan
30 days ago
Removing the HTTP compression profile would be a terrible idea. That's like trying to run a marathon in a sauna without any water. Definitely not the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
6 days ago
A: Good point. Let's go with removing the HTTP profile and also modifying the virtual server type to performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
12 days ago
B: No, that's not the right move. Let's remove the HTTP profile instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
17 days ago
A: I think we should remove the web acceleration profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Billye
1 months ago
I think we should remove HTTP compression profile and HTTP profile.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel