F5 Networks Exam 201 Topic 10 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam

Question #: 96
Topic #: 10

As a part of the Setup Utility, the administrator sets the host name for the BIG IP. What would be the result if the two systems in a redundant pair were set to the same host name?

AHost names do not matter in redundant pair communication.

BIn a redundant pair, the two systems will always have the same host name. The parameter is synchronized between the systems.

CThe first time the systems are synchronized the receiving system will be assigned the same self-IP addresses as the source system.

DWhen the administrator attempts to access the configuration utility using the host name, they will always connect to the active system.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Frederica at Sep 08, 2024, 02:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kayleigh

2 months ago

I wonder if the administrator can set the host name to 'Iron Man' and then pretend to be Tony Stark while configuring the BIG-IP. That would be a pretty funny approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curtis

2 months ago

I'm still a bit confused about how the host name works in a redundant pair setup. Isn't the self-IP address more important for communication between the systems?

upvoted 0 times

Veta

1 months ago

C) The first time the systems are synchronized the receiving system will be assigned the same self-IP addresses as the source system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

2 months ago

B) In a redundant pair, the two systems will always have the same host name. The parameter is synchronized between the systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlie

2 months ago

A) Host names do not matter in redundant pair communication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Romana

2 months ago

Option B makes the most sense to me. The host name is supposed to be the same between the two systems in a redundant pair, right? That's how they stay in sync.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

3 months ago

I think option C makes sense too. The self-IP addresses could get assigned incorrectly if the host names are the same.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

3 months ago

I'm pretty sure the host name doesn't matter in a redundant pair. The systems should be able to communicate regardless of the host name setting.

upvoted 0 times

Lashandra

1 months ago

D) When the administrator attempts to access the configuration utility using the host name, they will always connect to the active system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Romana

2 months ago

C) The first time the systems are synchronized the receiving system will be assigned the same self-IP addresses as the source system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linette

2 months ago

B) In a redundant pair, the two systems will always have the same host name. The parameter is synchronized between the systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

2 months ago

A) Host names do not matter in redundant pair communication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anika

3 months ago

Option D seems to be the correct answer. The host name is used to access the configuration utility, so it should connect to the active system in the redundant pair.

upvoted 0 times

Ivette

2 months ago

So, setting the same host name for both systems would ensure access to the active system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

2 months ago

Yes, that's right. It will always connect to the active system in the redundant pair.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolene

2 months ago

I think option D is correct. The host name is used to access the configuration utility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettyann

3 months ago

I believe the correct answer is D. The administrator will always connect to the active system when using the host name.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristian

3 months ago

I agree with you, Doug. It might lead to issues with accessing the configuration utility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doug

3 months ago

I think setting the same host name for both systems in a redundant pair could cause confusion.

upvoted 0 times

...