Exin Exam SIAMP Topic 5 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's SIAMP exam

Question #: 7
Topic #: 5

- ZYX has selected OUTSCO to be the service integrator, provide hosting for the mainframes and servers, and the wide area network for ZYX - ZYXS will provide the service desk for the SIAM ecosystem.

- All other service providers with rolling contracts will continue to provide their services

- The CIO has asked for the development of a tooling strategy for the SIAM ecosystem.

- The CEO wants to achieve an optimum balance between cost and data integrity.

What tooling strategy should ZYX use?

AAll service providers use the OUTSCO toolset or integrate their own toolset with OUTSCO's toolset

BAll service providers use the OUTSCO toolset within six months after transitioning to SIAM

CAll service providers use the ZYXS toolset or integrate their own toolset with the ZYXS toolset.

DAll service providers use their own toolsets and integration will be achieved through re-keying

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Tooling Strategy Requirements: The tooling strategy must achieve a balance between cost and data integrity, as specified by the CEO.

Service Integrator's Role: OUTSCO, as the service integrator, has a central role in the SIAM ecosystem. Ensuring that all service providers use the OUTSCO toolset or integrate with it promotes consistency and data integrity.

Cost-Effective Integration: Integrating with the OUTSCO toolset avoids the high costs associated with re-keying data from disparate toolsets, which can be prone to errors and inconsistencies.

Unified Toolset Benefits:

Consistency: Using a common toolset ensures consistent processes and reporting across all service providers.

Data Integrity: A single toolset minimizes the risk of data loss or corruption during integrations.

Efficiency: It enhances efficiency in incident, problem, and change management processes.

Alternative Options:

Forcing all providers to use the OUTSCO toolset within six months (Option B) may be impractical and disruptive.

Using the ZYXS toolset (Option C) does not align with the central role of OUTSCO as the service integrator.

Allowing each provider to use their own toolsets with manual integration (Option D) is costly and risks data integrity issues.

SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Tooling and Information Management

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Toolset Integration Sections

by Ardella at Jul 12, 2024, 04:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SIAMP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Brock

3 months ago

I'm picturing the CEO trying to balance cost and data integrity like a circus performer juggling chainsaws. Good luck with that, folks!

upvoted 0 times

Cheryl

1 months ago

D) All service providers use their own toolsets and integration will be achieved through re-keying

upvoted 0 times

...

Geraldo

1 months ago

C) All service providers use the ZYXS toolset or integrate their own toolset with the ZYXS toolset.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sean

2 months ago

B) All service providers use the OUTSCO toolset within six months after transitioning to SIAM

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

2 months ago

A) All service providers use the OUTSCO toolset or integrate their own toolset with OUTSCO's toolset

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

3 months ago

Option D? Really? Re-keying data? What is this, the Stone Age? I'd rather use carrier pigeons to transmit data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reuben

3 months ago

Option C is a bit odd. Why would ZYX want to use their own ZYXS toolset when OUTSCO is the service integrator? That just adds an unnecessary layer of complexity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matt

3 months ago

I disagree with Option A. Forcing all service providers to use OUTSCO's toolset could be costly and disruptive. Option B, with a 6-month transition period, is a more pragmatic approach.

upvoted 0 times

Helga

2 months ago

Option A could be too drastic for all service providers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

2 months ago

I agree, it allows for a smooth transition without immediate disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherell

2 months ago

I think Option B is a good compromise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christoper

3 months ago

It's important to find a balance between cost and data integrity, and Option B seems to achieve that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

3 months ago

Option B gives the service providers time to adjust and integrate their own toolsets with OUTSCO's.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krissy

3 months ago

I agree, forcing all service providers to use OUTSCO's toolset could be expensive and create unnecessary challenges.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

3 months ago

I think Option B is the best choice. It allows for a smooth transition without causing too much disruption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

3 months ago

I see your point, Theron. But I think option B could be a good compromise, giving service providers some time to transition to OUTSCO toolset.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theron

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option C is better. Using ZYXS toolset would align with the service desk being provided by ZYXS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Royce

3 months ago

I think option A makes sense. It would ensure consistency and efficiency in the tooling strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryln

3 months ago

Option A seems the most logical choice. Integrating all the service providers' toolsets with OUTSCO's toolset will ensure a seamless and efficient SIAM ecosystem.

upvoted 0 times