ZYX has decided to appoint ZYXS as service integrator using the lead supplier structure ZYXS will need to fill new roles with additional skilled resources The contract with OUTSCO will be terminated, and all the component services will be transitioned to FIELD$CO: MAILSCO. NETSCO. ZYXD and ZYXS
The SIAM Project Board has just agreed that after the transition there will no longer be a requirement for service delivery managers in ZYXUK to manage the outsourced contract with OUTSCO
What is the best way to deal with this situation?
Tooling Strategy Requirements: The tooling strategy must achieve a balance between cost and data integrity, as specified by the CEO.
Service Integrator's Role: OUTSCO, as the service integrator, has a central role in the SIAM ecosystem. Ensuring that all service providers use the OUTSCO toolset or integrate with it promotes consistency and data integrity.
Cost-Effective Integration: Integrating with the OUTSCO toolset avoids the high costs associated with re-keying data from disparate toolsets, which can be prone to errors and inconsistencies.
Unified Toolset Benefits:
Consistency: Using a common toolset ensures consistent processes and reporting across all service providers.
Data Integrity: A single toolset minimizes the risk of data loss or corruption during integrations.
Efficiency: It enhances efficiency in incident, problem, and change management processes.
Alternative Options:
Forcing all providers to use the OUTSCO toolset within six months (Option B) may be impractical and disruptive.
Using the ZYXS toolset (Option C) does not align with the central role of OUTSCO as the service integrator.
Allowing each provider to use their own toolsets with manual integration (Option D) is costly and risks data integrity issues.
SIAM Foundation Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Tooling and Information Management
SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Toolset Integration Sections
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!