ZYXS has been selected as the service integrator. They will also provide some hosted application services, using ZYXD as a subcontractor. ZYXS will also provide a central service desk for the SIAM ecosystem.
Considering ZYXS, which factor is most critical to the success of SIAM?
Introduction:
The complexity of the governance framework in a SIAM ecosystem can be influenced by various factors.
Analyzing the Options:
Option A:
ZYX's merger with a Japanese competitor.
Mergers typically introduce significant complexity due to differences in organizational cultures, processes, and systems.
Option B:
ZYXD's job descriptions and operating procedures.
While relevant, this does not add as much complexity as a merger.
Option C:
ZYXG's IT strategy and local service providers.
Important, but not as impactful on governance complexity as a merger.
Option D:
ZYXUK's lack of attendance at the Change Approval Forum.
Significant for specific processes but not the most complex factor overall.
Conclusion:
Option A (ZYX's merger with a Japanese competitor) will contribute most to the complexity of the governance framework due to the integration challenges it poses.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!