Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin Exam CDCS Topic 3 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's CDCS exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 3
[All CDCS Questions]

What is a potential disadvantage of using water mist as a fire extinguishing system?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A potential disadvantage of using a water mist fire suppression system is that it can rapidly increase the humidity within the data center, which may pose risks to sensitive electronic equipment. Excessive humidity can lead to condensation, which could damage electronics and lead to short circuits or corrosion over time.

Detailed Explanation:

Water mist systems use fine droplets to suppress fires by cooling and displacing heat. However, the moisture generated may raise the humidity level to the point where it exceeds safe operational limits for IT equipment. Therefore, while water mist systems are effective in fire suppression, they may not be ideal in environments where high humidity could damage sensitive equipment.

EPI Data Center Specialist References:

EPI guidelines advise considering the impact of humidity from fire suppression systems, particularly in environments housing electronic equipment. It's essential to weigh the benefits of fire suppression against potential risks to operational equipment when choosing suppression methods.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Salome
17 days ago
Ha! Imagine if the water mist was so small it could only put out matchsticks. Option D is just plain silly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
20 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Option C sounds like it could be a real issue too. Messing with the oxygen levels? Yikes!
upvoted 0 times
Roxane
8 days ago
B) It will rapidly increase the humidity level in the data center, which can cause a potential risk for the operation of the equipment
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
11 days ago
A) It only uses 10% of the water normally used in a water-based fire suppression, which might not be enough to suppress the fire
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rana
21 days ago
But wouldn't the small droplets in water mist also limit its effectiveness for larger fires?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
26 days ago
I agree with Renay. Option B is the way to go. Gotta keep that data center nice and dry!
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
27 days ago
I agree with Lenna. Using less water may not be enough to suppress a fire effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
28 days ago
Option B is the correct answer. Increasing humidity levels in a data center can definitely be a problem for the equipment.
upvoted 0 times
Carin
6 days ago
C) It extracts oxygen from the air creating a potential risk for humans inside the computer room
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 days ago
B) It will rapidly increase the humidity level in the data center, which can cause a potential risk for the operation of the equipment
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
17 days ago
A) It only uses 10% of the water normally used in a water-based fire suppression, which might not be enough to suppress the fire
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
19 days ago
B) It will rapidly increase the humidity level in the data center, which can cause a potential risk for the operation of the equipment
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
21 days ago
A) It only uses 10% of the water normally used in a water-based fire suppression, which might not be enough to suppress the fire
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
2 months ago
I think the potential disadvantage is that it only uses 10% of the water normally used in a water-based fire suppression.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel