Exin Exam CDCP Topic 9 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's CDCP exam

Question #: 28
Topic #: 9

How many monitoring points should be used in Temperature Measurement?

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

According to the EPI Data Centre Professional (CDCP) Reference Materials, the recommended number of monitoring points for temperature measurement in a data centre is 3 per rack: one at the top, one at the middle, and one at the bottom1. This is to ensure that the temperature distribution within the rack is uniform and within the acceptable range for the equipment. The temperature sensors should be placed at the front of the rack, where the air enters the equipment, and not at the back, where the hot air exits1.

by Jesusita at Nov 17, 2024, 06:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CDCP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Scot

1 months ago

Hah! This is a trick question, isn't it? The answer is actually E: as many monitoring points as you can fit! Gotta cover all the bases, right? Temperature's a fickle thing, you never know where it might pop up.

upvoted 0 times

Tawna

3 days ago

E) as many monitoring points as you can fit!

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandee

14 days ago

D) 4

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

28 days ago

C) 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Chun

1 months ago

B) 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Esteban

1 months ago

A) 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

2 months ago

I'd say A. Why overcomplicate things? One sensor is all you need. Unless, of course, you're trying to measure the temperature of a volcano or something. Then maybe you'd want a few more, just to be safe. Wouldn't want to get too close to the fiery abyss, you know?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

2 months ago

I'm going with C. Three's the magic number, right? Covers all the bases without getting too complicated. Plus, it's a nice odd number. Keeps things interesting.

upvoted 0 times

Jerlene

10 days ago

I'm going with C too. Three seems like a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noe

26 days ago

I would go with 4 just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

28 days ago

I agree, 3 seems like a good balance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viola

1 months ago

I think 2 is enough. No need to overcomplicate things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celia

1 months ago

C) 3

upvoted 0 times

...

Junita

1 months ago

B) 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Ricarda

1 months ago

A) 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

2 months ago

I believe using 3 monitoring points would be even better for Temperature Measurement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederic

2 months ago

I agree with Santos, having 2 monitoring points will provide more accurate data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Silva

2 months ago

D is the way to go, my friend. Gotta have that redundancy, you know? Can't trust a single point of failure when it comes to temperature monitoring. Imagine if your one sensor goes kaput, then what? Chaos ensues!

upvoted 0 times

...

Floyd

2 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is B. Why would we need more than 2 monitoring points for temperature measurement? It's not like we're trying to map the climate of the Arctic or something.

upvoted 0 times