BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Exin Exam ASM Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASM exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All ASM Questions]

A company is transitioning to Scrum. The approach taken is to Stan with a small project and a single Scrum team. Over the course of a year the rest of the company should transition, using a split-and-seed type of transition.

The first two experiments were very successful and the teams shared their excited stones with the entire company After the first two experiments with Scrum this was discontinued Although the employees enjoyed learning about Scrum this way management found it a waste of time Instead they focused on training the managers and getting the employees and managers into the right mindset To facilitate training they hired external Scrum Masters.

Although the start of the transition was received well the enthusiasm for Scrum quickly dampens. The transition ultimately fails.

What is the most likely reason that the transition did not work?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Solange at Mar 06, 2024, 06:43 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Nada
5 months ago
Well, regardless of the reasons, it's clear that communication and involvement of all employees is crucial for a successful transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
5 months ago
Yeah, that could be a possibility. Starting small might not have been effective for such a big transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
I think the problem lies in the transition plan itself. Maybe the split-and-seed approach was not the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe the issue was that the Scrum teams didn't share their experiences enough to get everyone excited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
5 months ago
I think the transition failed because the Scrum Masters couldn't change the mindset of the managers alone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
5 months ago
Yes, it's important for both the teams and managers to be on board and actively involved in the transition process for it to be successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
5 months ago
It seems like a combination of factors contributed to the failure of the transition to Scrum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
I agree with User3, perhaps the training provided by the Scrum Masters wasn't enough to shift the mindset of the managers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
6 months ago
Maybe the problem was that the externally hired Scrum Masters couldn't change the mindset of the managers effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
6 months ago
Really? I believe the issue was that the Scrum teams did not share their experiences with the other employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
6 months ago
I think the transition to Scrum failed because of the split-and-seed transition approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel