Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Exin Exam ASF Topic 3 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ASF exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 3
[All ASF Questions]

A team estimates a Story using the Planning Poker technique. The team decides to allocate five Story points to the Story, because the Developers estimated two points and the Testers estimated three points.

Which statement is true regarding this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Heidy at Apr 19, 2024, 11:02 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ASF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Yaeko
8 months ago
Yeah, I think the focus should be on how points are allocated, not consulting the Product Owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
9 months ago
I don't think that's relevant to the scenario given in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
9 months ago
What about option D, where the team forgets to consult the Product Owner?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
10 months ago
I agree with it makes sense to assign points for the entire Story.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
10 months ago
I think the answer is B because points are assigned for the overall Story.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
10 months ago
That's right, we need to consider the overall effort required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
10 months ago
Points are assigned for the overall Story, not for parts of the Story.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
10 months ago
Because the Developers estimated two points and the Testers estimated three points.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
10 months ago
We allocated five Story points to the Story.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel