BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 6 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 6
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGlS user has high-resolution single-band data and another raster data set that is multiband with lower resolution. Which process is used to convert the single-band data to multi-band, while retaining its resolution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lizette
1 months ago
Pan sharpen all the way! C) is the clear winner here. Although, I have to say, I'm a bit disappointed they didn't include an option for 'throw it all in the microwave and see what happens.' That's usually my go-to strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
1 months ago
I'm going with C) pan sharpen. Seems like the obvious choice to me. Although, I do wonder if there's some secret trick involving stacking bands that I'm missing...
upvoted 0 times
Luann
24 days ago
I'm not sure, maybe stacking bands could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
27 days ago
I agree, pan sharpen seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
30 days ago
I think C) pan sharpen is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micheline
1 months ago
I think pan sharpen is used to enhance spatial resolution, not convert single-band to multi-band data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) pan sharpen could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
1 months ago
D) visualize? Really? Who would even consider that as an option here? The question is specifically about converting data, not just viewing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
2 months ago
I agree with Myrtie, stacking bands is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
2 months ago
Definitely C) pan sharpen. That's the classic way to combine high-res single-band data with lower-res multi-band data.
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
9 days ago
Visualizing is important too, but pan sharpening is the key process here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
19 days ago
Stacking bands wouldn't work in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
27 days ago
It's important to maintain the resolution when combining the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
1 months ago
I agree, pan sharpening is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linwood
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking B) NDVI might work, but I'm not confident about that. Pan sharpening does sound like the right approach though.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnta
1 months ago
Pan sharpening it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
1 months ago
Let's go with pan sharpening then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
1 months ago
I agree, pan sharpening would retain the resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
2 months ago
I think pan sharpening is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myrtie
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) stack bands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) pan sharpen. That seems like the best way to maintain the high resolution while adding more bands.
upvoted 0 times
Lemuel
2 months ago
Yes, stacking bands would just combine them without improving resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
2 months ago
I agree, pan sharpening is the way to go to maintain high resolution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel